Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04924790
NCT04924790
Unknown
Not Applicable

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Preferences and Decision Making for Obstructive Urinary Stone Interventions

Ankara Training and Research Hospital1 site in 1 country158 target enrollmentSeptember 1, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Urinary Stone
Sponsor
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Enrollment
158
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Rates of interventions preferred by patients
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the intervention preferences of patients with obstructive urinary stones who are suitable for operation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary aim is to compare and evaluate the preferences compared to the pre-pandemic period and to gain a perspective on how the decision-making process has changed from the patient's point of view. Thus, by trying to understand how the COVID-19 epidemic affects the treatment choice decisions of patients, the investigators aim to determine how the state of anxiety changes these preferences.

Detailed Description

The transformative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare use remains an open question. At the onset of the pandemic, policies to limit transmission were adopted, including stay-at-home decisions, social distancing, and postponing elective surgery. Such policies have contributed to reduced emergency room admissions, increased concern about COVID-19, and hospital systems have had to prioritize emergency intervention. Obstructive urolithiasis is a clinical condition that usually causes severe flank pain and causes emergency admission. It is still unclear how the epidemic impairs the treatment pathways of the obstructive urolithiasis that contributes to the emergency room visit. Treatment options range from observation and medical expulsive therapy to operative interventions such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Patient preference, stone characteristics and comorbidities are of great importance in decision making. However, since obstructive ureteral stones that cannot be resolved spontaneously can cause irreversible renal parenchymal damage and obstructive pyelonephritis in a short time, the option of operation is always prioritized. Patient perspectives on how COVID-19 is changing healthcare use and decision-making still remain unclear. In our study, the investigators plan to record patient treatment preferences by explaining in detail how and where treatment options will be applied, success and complication rates for patients diagnosed with obstructive urolithiasis and suitable for intervention in the outpatient clinic. In addition, when evaluating patient preferences, the investigators foresee to determine how the COVID-19 pandemic process has changed compared to before. It is planned that our study will have a patient-centered approach with detailed oral and written information in outpatient clinic conditions.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 1, 2021
End Date
August 1, 2022
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ali Kaan Yildiz

Principal Investigator

Ankara Training and Research Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Obstructive Urinary Stone

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous operation for urinary stone
  • Presence of bladder stone
  • Presence of stent in the ureter
  • Previous radiotherapy to the pelvic and abdominal region
  • Pregnancy
  • Neurological disease

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Rates of interventions preferred by patients

Time Frame: 6 months

Rates of interventions preferred by patients for obstructive urinary stones

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials