Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2023/06/053718
CTRI/2023/06/053718Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Comparison of ulnar and radial artery cannulation under ultrasound guidance in obese and non-obese groups- a randomised study

AIIMS Bhubaneswar1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: March 7, 2023Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To compare the first attempt success rate of radial and ulnar artery cannulation under ultrasound guidance in obese and non-obese groups
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaOutcomesInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Invasive bloodpressure monitoring is commonly done. Radial artery is commonly cannulated.With the advent of USG deeper arteries like ulnar artery can even be cannulated.In obese patients artery cannulation is proposed to be difficult but we expectit to be done with more ease under USG guidance. Comparison of first attemptsuccess rate of ulnar versus radial arterial cannulation under USG guidance inobese and non-obese groups of patients has not yet been studied.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Computer generated randomization
Masking
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 65.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • •ASA 1 and ASA 2 patients
  • •age 18 to 65 year
  • •positive modified Allen and inverse Allen test
  • •undergoing elective surgery under anaesthesia (general or regional) and requiring arterial cannulation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Following patients will be excluded:
  • •patients not giving consent
  • •patients having coagulopathy
  • •presence of local anatomic distortion (traumatic or congenital)
  • •presence of local site infection/cellulitis
  • •history of prior surgery in the area
  • •history of arterial cannulation in the area in last 14 days
  • •patients with vascular disease.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To compare the first attempt success rate of radial and ulnar artery cannulation under ultrasound guidance in obese and non-obese groups

Time Frame: At the time 0f arterial cannulation

Secondary Outcomes

  • 1. ease of insertion of cannula-easy (1 attempt), difficult (2-3 attempts), failure (more than 3 attempts)(2. Cross-sectional area, maximum internal diameter and depth from skin surface- in short and in long axis view)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Government medical college

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RADIAL ARTERY CANNULATION USING TWO TECHNIQUES.
CTRI/2023/05/052399Goa Medical College100
Not yet recruiting
Unknown
Comparison of ulnar and radial artery cannulation with help of ultrasonography in obese and non-obese patients undergoing surgery under anesthesia
CTRI/2023/06/053718AIIMS Bhubaneswar
Completed
Not Applicable
Proximal vs Distal Radial Artery CannulationArterial CatheterizationRadial Artery Cannulation
NCT06658873Marmara University60
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Ulnar Artery Versus Radial Artery Cannulation in Paediatric PatientsArterial Catheterization
NCT05258903Brno University Hospital100
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Does Radial Artery Cannulation Affect the Perfusion Index(PI) of the Hand in Liver Transplant Operations?Arterial Catheterization, PeripheralComplications Perfusion
NCT06077396Inonu University50