Evaluation of the Impact of an Individual Peer Support Intervention for Stroke Patients When Returning Home: a Mixed Methods Pilot Study
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- Other: Peer support
- Registration Number
- NCT04197258
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Brief Summary
Going back home following a stroke is a key step for the patient and his or her relatives. Due to the brutality of stroke and increasingly shorter in-hospital lengths of stay, patients and their families must adapt quickly to the patient's new health functioning and the new caregiving and support role for family members.
Peer support could be an innovative and inexpensive approach to addressing these issues. Peer-helpers are patient-partners who put their experiential knowledge from life with the disease at the disposal of other patients to offer them social and emotional support in the management of the disease in connection with care, social and community structures. Group peer support programs face organizational challenges and fail to address the full range of patient needs for stroke home visits. Individualized and more flexible support could better meet the needs of patients. Our hypothesis is that individual peer support improves quality of life and patient empowerment during the discharge period compared to usual practice.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Adult patient,
- Having had a first confirmed, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- Managed in the participating rehabilitation center
- Whose discharge to home directly from the rehabilitation center is planned
- Presenting a modified Rankin score of 1 to 3 when deciding to leave the stroke center
- Having given its written consent
- Whose main residence is located in the Rhône department
- Aphasic patients may be included if a caregiver can follow up with the case manager
- Patient living in an institution prior to stroke
- included in a gerontological network before stroke
- Patient unable to understand quality of life questionnaires
- Patient with unstable medical or psychological conditions who, in the opinion of the investigator, could lead the subject to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study or could compromise patient safety or participation in the study
- Patient under guardianship or curatorship
- Patient not affiliated to a social health insurance
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description intervention group Peer support For 6 months after discharge, patients in the intervention group will benefit from peer support by a trained patient (number and frequency of contacts defined according to the patient's needs). The intervention aims to improve the patient's ability to manage his or her situation and meet his or her needs upon discharge at home, including identifying and seeking for the necessary health or social resources
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Feasibility measure 6 months The feasibility of the intervention will be evaluated as success with a combined criteria including:
* Recruitment and training of 2 peer helpers,
* Support offered to 20 patients by the peer helpers during the intervention period defined by at least one meeting before and one contact after discharge per patient included in period after,
* Good acceptability by patients, carers and peer helpers. These data will be collected by a qualitative approach associating semi-directive interviews, focus groups and participant observation.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Disability 6 months proportion of patients with disabilities at 6 months evaluated by the Modified Rankin Scale (no disability corresponding to mRs\<3)
Adherence 6 months proportion of adherent patients at 6 months evaluated by the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)
Human, material and financial assistance provided at home 6 months Human, material and financial assistance provided at home collected by interviewing the patient
Quality of life between the discharge from hospital and 6 months 6 months Evolution of the dimensions of the SIS at hospital discharge and 6 months: global recovery
Anxiety and depression scores between discharge and 6 months 6 months Evolution of anxiety and depression scores between discharge and 6 months after discharge, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) score
Patient activation Measure 6 months Evolution of patient activation between discharge and 6 months after discharge, measured by the Patient activation Measure (PAM) score
Satisfaction measure 6 months Perceived satisfaction of the support received on during the discharge period will be collected by interviewing the patient
Caregiver burden 6 months Evolution of caregiver burden between discharge and 6 months after discharge, measured by the Zarit burden scale
Caregiver satisfaction 6 months Perceived caregiver satisfaction of the support during the patient's discharge period will be collected by interviewing caregiver
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hôpital Henry Gabrielle
🇫🇷Saint-Genis-Laval, France