A COMPARATIVE CLINICAL STUDY TO COMPARE THETOOTH MOVEMENTS WITH MICRO OSTEOPERFORATION AT SINGLE SITE VERSUS THAT AT MULTIPLE SITE

Phase 1/2

Not yet recruiting

Brief Summary: Over the recent years, as a result of the emphasis placed on facial esthetics, an increasing number of adults are reporting for orthodontic treatment. However there are still a large number of patients who are reluctant to seek orthodontic treatment because of the prolonged duration of treatment.Several methods have been proposed to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement and reduce the treatment time.Micro osteoperforation (MOP) is the currently available micro invasive option to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. MOP can be completed chairside in minutes, and does not require any advanced training. Additionally the treatment yields little discomfort to the patient. There is zero recovery time, and the patients will be able to immediately return to their normal daily routine.*Hence this prospective clinical trial is intended to compare the efficiency of MOPs performed at the extraction site; ie distal to canine with that of MOPs performed in the interdental bone of all the anterior teeth for anterior en mass retraction.*

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects in whom maxillary 1st premolar1.All subjects undergoing treatment with Pre-adjusted Edgewise appliance (PEA) with 0.022 MBT prescription 2. Subjects who have completed the leveling and alignment ( Ist phase) 3.Patients in whom maxillary first premolar extraction will be indicated for en masse retraction of anteriors 4.Patients who will have a minimum of 5 mm of space available for en masse retraction of anteriors 5. Subjects in the age group of 18.
30 years. 6. Subjects with average skeletal pattern.

Exclusion Criteria

Previous history of orthodontic treatment.
Presence of any craniofacial anomalies.
Presence of any signs and symptoms of periodontal disease.
Long term use of phenytoin sodium, cyclosporin, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids and calcium channel blockers.
Poor oral hygiene for more than 2 visits.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
DECREASE IN TREATMENT DURATION	FASTER TOOTH MOVEMENT \| FASTER TREATMENT

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
MEASUREMENT OF ANCHORAGE LOSS	BASELINE 3 MONTHS

Locations (1): SRI HASANAMBA DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
🇮🇳
Hassan, KARNATAKA, India
SRI HASANAMBA DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
🇮🇳Hassan, KARNATAKA, India
DEMELTA NOBERT
Principal investigator
8304871030
demeltad@gmail.com