Does A Retropulsion Prevention Device Equalize The Surgical Success of Ho:YAG Laser and Pneumatic Lithotripters for Upper Ureteral Stones?
- Conditions
- pper ureteral stonesUpper ureteral stonesRenal and Urogenital - Other renal and urogenital disordersSurgery - Surgical techniques
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12616000865415
- Lead Sponsor
- Ahi Evran University, Academical Researches Supporting Unit
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
Patients between 18 and 82 with obstructive, radioopaque and primary unilateral upper ureteral stones were included in this study.
Exclusion criterias were abnormal coagulation profile, previous SWL, bilateral ureteral stones, radiolucent stones, likelihood of spontaneous stone passage, and presence of a non-functioning kidney. Patients with narrow ureters that required stenting and with push-back of the stone before activation of the stone cone were excluded. Stone localization in the fluoroscopic stone immediately prior to the surgery was compared with preoperative stone localizations. Patients with changing stone localizations were excluded from the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patients were evaluated on the first postoperative day before discharge with plain x-ray and ultrasonography for residual stone fragments and hydronephrosis. Patients with residual fragments greater than or equal to 4mm were accepted as surgical failures. Patients with stone-free status or with residual fragments <4mm were accepted as surgical success.[Postoperative first day.]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Requirement for auxiliary procedures one month after surgery, assessed by x-ray and ultrasonography. A decision was made one month after surgery for auxiliary procedures. [One month after surgery]