Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04141774
NCT04141774CompletedNot Applicable

Stroke Rehabilitation Using BCI Technology

University of Wisconsin, Madison1 site in 1 country84 target enrollmentStarted: September 27, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
84
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Action Research Arm Test Scores

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to determine if functional muscle stimulation, directed by electroencephalogram (EEG) output, can increase the extent of stroke recovery on behavioral measures and induce brain plasticity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Participants will include stroke patients with upper-limb hemiparesis and can expect to be on study for approximately 4 months.

Detailed Description

Ongoing research (NCT02098265) suggests that noninvasive EEG driven Brain Computer Interface (BCI) systems hold the potential for facilitating recovery in the chronic phase after stroke by synchronizing central or brain activity with peripheral movements and thereby harnessing brain plasticity.

The specific aims of this study are:

Aim 1: To investigate the efficacy of active FES vs. passive FES, as measured by changes in behavioral measures. The investigators hypothesize that improvements in motor function will be significantly greater using the active FES therapy than the passive FES therapy.

Aim 2: To investigate the relationship between brain functional activation patterns and behavior changes induced by active vs. passive FES intervention. The investigators hypothesize that changes induced by active FES (as measured by brain fMRI and EEG measures) will show greater adaptive brain reorganization changes (i.e. brain changes that correlate with improved outcomes) than that induced by the passive FES.

Aim 3: To investigate the relationship between brain white matter integrity and behavior changes induced by active vs. passive FES intervention. The investigators hypothesize that changes induced by active FES (as measured by brain DTI measures) will show greater adaptive brain reorganization changes (i.e. brain changes that correlate with improved outcomes) than that induced by the passive FES.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
50 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •New-onset ischemic stroke 12 months prior - chronic time frame;
  • •Right hand dominant - affected arm;
  • •Mild to moderate unilateral upper extremity impairment or severe unilateral upper extremity impairment;
  • •No upper extremity injury or conditions that limited use prior to the stroke;
  • •Must be able to provide informed consent on their own behalf.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Inability to competently participate in study procedures
  • •Concurrent upper extremity therapy, other neurological or psychiatric disorders

Arms & Interventions

Passive FES

Active Comparator

Subjects randomized to this control group will be asked to participate in a passive FES intervention or non-EEG guided muscle stimulation. Participation will include behavioral assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment.

Intervention: Functional Electric Stimulation (FES) (Device)

Passive FES

Active Comparator

Subjects randomized to this control group will be asked to participate in a passive FES intervention or non-EEG guided muscle stimulation. Participation will include behavioral assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment.

Intervention: Behavioral Assessments (Behavioral)

Passive FES

Active Comparator

Subjects randomized to this control group will be asked to participate in a passive FES intervention or non-EEG guided muscle stimulation. Participation will include behavioral assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment.

Intervention: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Other)

Active FES

Experimental

Subjects randomized to this experimental group will be asked to complete the active FES intervention which include EEG guided muscle stimulation. Participation will include behavioral assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging, functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment, and EEG.

Intervention: Functional Electric Stimulation (FES) (Device)

Active FES

Experimental

Subjects randomized to this experimental group will be asked to complete the active FES intervention which include EEG guided muscle stimulation. Participation will include behavioral assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging, functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment, and EEG.

Intervention: Behavioral Assessments (Behavioral)

Active FES

Experimental

Subjects randomized to this experimental group will be asked to complete the active FES intervention which include EEG guided muscle stimulation. Participation will include behavioral assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging, functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment, and EEG.

Intervention: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Other)

Active FES

Experimental

Subjects randomized to this experimental group will be asked to complete the active FES intervention which include EEG guided muscle stimulation. Participation will include behavioral assessments, functional magnetic resonance imaging, functional electric stimulation (FES) treatment, and EEG.

Intervention: EEG (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Action Research Arm Test Scores

Time Frame: baseline, 7 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months

The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is designed for evaluation of upper extremity function. This test consists of sections for Grasp, Grip, Pinch and Gross Movements and comprise a total of 19 tests. Each test is scored 0-3 where 0 is 'no movement' and 3 is 'the movement is performed normally'. Each section is scored separately and the scores added for a total possible range of scores from 0-57 where the higher the score, the complete and efficient the movement. Scores will be reported for baseline, mid (\~7 weeks), post (\~10 weeks), and end of study, up to 4 months.

Stroke Impact Scale

Time Frame: baseline, 7 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months

The Stroke Impact Scale, or SIS, was created to assess changes in impairments, activities and participation following a stroke. Scores on the SIS will provide an index of clinically "meaningful" change representing the change in the patient's mental and physical abilities concurrent with their performance on the verbal fluency and memory tasks. The 4 physical function domains (strength, hand function, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and mobility) will be collapsed to a physical function subscale. All domain scores range from 0 to 100 with 100 being the best.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)(4 months)
  • Change in Electroencephalogram (EEG) Response Strength(baseline 1, baseline 2, 7 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months)
  • Signal Change in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)(baseline 1, baseline 2, 7 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months)
  • Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT)(baseline 1, baseline 2, 7 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months)
  • Motor Activity Log (MAL): Amount of Use(baseline 1, baseline 2, 7 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months)
  • Motor Activity Log (MAL): Quality of Movement(baseline 1, baseline 2, 7 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months)
  • Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)(4 months)
  • Hand Grip Strength(baseline 1, baseline 2, 7 weeks, 10 weeks, 4 months)
  • Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)(4 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials