MedPath

Evaluation of Spa Therapy in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Plaque Psoriasis
Interventions
Other: Immediate spa treatment
Other: Late Spa treatment
Registration Number
NCT02098213
Lead Sponsor
Association Francaise pour la Recherche Thermale
Brief Summary

Assessment of quality of life after Spa therapy (4 ½ months follow-up) in the treatment of plaque psoriasis: Spa versus usual care in patients with plaque psoriasis.

Detailed Description

Psoriasis is one of the most common skin diseases, affecting 2-3% of the general population; more than 1 million people in France.

This auto-immune erythematosquamous inflammatory dermatosis occurs on a particular genetic background and has a chronic course. Psoriasis has a history as an indication for dermatological spa treatment (water cures in the Dead Sea). As these treatments are a combination of balneotherapy and heliotherapy, many recent studies have attempted to assess the value and position the relative benefit of each therapeutic element. Over the last four decades various different phototherapy techniques have been widely used in the treatment of psoriasis. The thermal option for many psoriasis patients depends on personal choice, or their doctor's or dermatologist's recommendation. In 1994 only one third of the 16,875 spa treatments for dermatological conditions (about 5625 cures) were for psoriasis, suggesting that spa treatment is underused as a treatment for psoriasis. Nobody can challenge the therapeutic contribution of biotherapy in the treatment of anatomically destructive diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, but the use of these treatments is not without risk and economic impact. There is thus a need for less intensive treatments that have little risk of serious side effects and are less expensive.

The use of spa therapy in psoriasis should be understood as complementary and not an alternative to all other treatments. The choice of treatment is guided by the patient's characteristics and pathology (concomitant diseases, extent of lesions, treatment history) and the specialty (adverse effects, cumulative dose). In psoriasis it may be necessary to use different lines of treatment because psoriasis is a lifetime disease. Side effects of systemic treatments such as biotherapy, cyclosporine, methotrexate, synthetic retinoids, and also phototherapy (PUVA and UVB) are cumulative over time. A course of spa treatment should allow a respite before resorting to other systemic therapy.

However, the spa dermatology still suffers from a lack of large-scale evaluation and especially an objective assessment using reliable methodologies that limit bias. This is the purpose of this study.

There are no randomized controlled multicenter clinical trials evaluating spa treatment for psoriasis, although an Italian non-randomized study included a few dozen patients and confirmed the clinical benefit of the treatment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
128
Inclusion Criteria
  • Both sexes, over 18 years of age, patients with plaque psoriasis for more than one year diagnosed by a dermatologist
  • Stable treatment in the last 6 months
  • DLQI score > 10
  • patients volunteering for spa treatment within 6 weeks
  • consenting to participate to the study with informed consent form signed after appropriate information
  • Affiliation to the French social security system or equivalent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy, parturient or breast feeding
  • Psychiatric illness or social situation that would preclude study compliance
  • Refusal of consent
  • Refusal of spa treatment
  • Contra-indication to spa treatment
  • Phototherapy in the last 3 months
  • Guttate, pustular or erythrodermic psoriasis Isolated nail psoriasis
  • Spa therapy in the past year
  • Person deprived of liberty or under legal guardianship

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Immediate Spa treatmentImmediate spa treatmentThree week course of spa treatment soon after randomization
Late Spa treatmentLate Spa treatmentThree week course of spa treatment soon after 4,5 months visit
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DQLI)4 ½ months after randomisation

proportion of patients with a score ≤ 10 at 4½ months in each arm of the study, spa treatment versus usual care.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Specific Quality Of Life4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation

proportion of patients in each arm of the study (spa treatment versus usual care) for the following specific dermatology questionnaires : DLQI score ≤ 10 at 6, 9 and 12 months and VQ Dermato score \> 35 at 4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months

Global Quality Of Life4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation

EuroQOL 5D questionnaire at 4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months

Clinical benefit of the psoriasis4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation

proportion of patients with a PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) 50 and PASI 75 at 4½, 6, 9 and 12 months in each arm of the study, spa treatment versus usual care.

pain and pruritus4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation

Self-administered questionnaire with Visual Analogue Scale for pain and for pruritus at 4 1/2, 6, 9, 12 months

Treatment follow up4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation

* Assessment of topical treatments within 12 months (number of tubes used per month)

* Number of phototherapy sessions

* Use of conventional systemic therapies (acitretin, methotrexate, cyclosporine) (number of weeks of treatment and dosage)

* Number of weeks of treatment by biotherapy

* Reduction in the use of the health care system (Number of hospitalizations and specialized consultations in connection with psoriasis or not) within 12 months

* Reports on the use of complementary and alternative medicines within12 months

patient's examination4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation

Impact of the spa treatment on overall metabolism indicators in the year

Will be collected at 4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months in the two groups:

* height an weight (BMI calculation)

* Waist measurement

* Blood pressure

Safety evaluation4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation

Evaluation of all adverse events attributable to treatment, or not, according to the usual criteria of pharmacovigilance in clinical trials

Stress evaluation4 1/2, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisatio

self administered questionnaire (PSS: Assessment of stress) at inclusion in the study only

Long term evaluation12 months

Evaluation of the maintenance of benefits at 12 months (stability of the long term effect) on the primary outcome and secondary outcomes.

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

Station Thermale Avene

🇫🇷

Avene, Languedoc-Rousillon, France

Thermes de Molitg les bains

🇫🇷

Molitg, Languedoc-Roussillon, France

Les thermes de ST-GERVAIS

🇫🇷

Le Fayet, Rhône-Alpe, France

Thermes La Roche Posay

🇫🇷

La Roche Posay, Poitou-Charentes, France

Etablissement thermal d'Uriage

🇫🇷

Uriage, Rhône-Alpe, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath