ISRCTN82387104已完成未知
ENhanced Control of Hypertension ANd Thrombolysis strokE stuDy: a multicentre randomised trial
The George Institute for Global Health (Australia)0 个研究点目标入组 4,587 人开始时间: 2011年11月4日最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 4,587
研究概览
简要总结
2015 rationale, design, and progress in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25832995 2018 statistical analysis plan in: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30299230 2018 alteplase-dose arm results in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29571842 (added 29/05/2019) 2019 results in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30739745 (added 29/05/2019)
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1. General criteria for use of thrombolytic treatment with rtPA:
- •1.1. Adult (age =18 years)
- •1.2. A clinical diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke confirmed by brain imaging
- •1.3. Able to receive treatment within 4.5 hours after the definite time of onset of symptoms
- •1.4. Have a systolic BP =185 mmHg (i.e. the guideline recommended level of eligibility for rtPA; patients with higher BP levels at presentation can still be included provided the BP is reduced to the entry level prior to commencement of the randomised treatment).
- •1.5. Provide informed consent (or via an appropriate proxy, according to local requirements)
- •2. Specific criteria for arm [A] of low-dose vs standard-dose rtPA.
- •2.1. No definite indication nor contraindication for either low-dose or standard-dose rtPA.
- •3. Specific criteria for arm [B] of intensive BP lowering vs guideline recommended BP control
- •3.1. Sustained elevated systolic BP level, defined as 2 readings =150 and =185 mmHg (i.e. the upper level for contraindication to use of thrombolysis)
- •3.2. No definite indication or contraindication to either immediate intensive? BP lowering (to a target of 140-150 mmHg systolic) versus guideline-based BP control (e.g. intensive BP lowering is feasible and does not appear to pose excessive hazard to the patient).
排除标准
- •Patients will not be eligible if there is one or more of the following:
- •1. Unlikely to potentially benefit from the therapy (e.g. advanced dementia, known severe pre-stroke disability (mRS scores 3-5), or a very high likelihood of death within 24 hours of stroke onset
- •2. Other medical illness that interferes with outcome assessments and follow-uP
研究者
相似试验
进行中(未招募)
1 期
ENCHANTED: A Trial to assess the effects of low- vs standard-dose clot-busting and intensive vs standard blood pressure-lowering treatments on outcome after acute ischaemic strokeEUCTR2011-005545-12-GBniversity of Leicester5,000
进行中(未招募)
1 期
Clinical trial to establish the effects of low dose rtPA and the effects of early intensive blood pressure lowering in patients with acute ischaemic strokeAcute ischaemic strokeEUCTR2014-002823-86-ESThe George Institute for Global Health Australia4,800
已完成
不适用
Effectiveness of community intervention programHypertensionISRCTN88146057Griffith University (Australia)1,600
已完成
不适用
A novel approach to treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients - A multicenter, double-blind, randomised study comparing the efficacy of combination therapy of Eprosartan versus Ramipril with low-dose Hydrochlorothiazide and Moxonidine on blood pressure levels in patients with hypertension and associated diabetes mellitus type 2 - rationale and design.Essential Hypertension grade I and IICirculatory SystemHypertensionISRCTN55725285Solvay Pharmaceuticals (Germany)
已完成
不适用
IMPlementation of gUideLines for the Management of Arterial hypertenSION. The IMPULSION StudyHigh Blood PressureNCT00416611Hellenic Atherosclerosis Society1,000
