MedPath

Comparison Between Open and Laparoscopic Splenic Aneurysms Repair

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Splenic Artery Aneurysm
Interventions
Procedure: Laparoscopic splenic aneurysm repair, eventual splenectomy
Procedure: Laparotomic splenic artery aneurysm repair, eventual artery reconstruction or splenectomy
Registration Number
NCT01387828
Lead Sponsor
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is compare two different surgical treatments of splenic artery aneurysms: open and laparoscopic approach.

Detailed Description

Laparoscopy has not spread into vascular surgery as it has in other surgical branches and still remains in the hands of a minority of surgeons. Splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) is an exception to the rule: an easy-to-reach position and relatively safe control favour the progressive diffusion of laparoscopic techniques.

An increasing number of cases is managed by minimally invasive surgery originating a number of case reports and small series published in recent literature. These papers are unanimous in signalling the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic technique as well as its appreciation by patients -often young females- who harbour the disease. However, perplexities still remain concerning the real potential of laparoscopy in this specific field, in particular considering the spectrum of technical solutions to be performed, the splenectomy rate and the feasibility and results of reconstructive surgery.

The low incidence of the disease justifies the low number of published laparoscopic series enrolling an adequate number of patients and, in particular, the absence of papers comparing open and laparoscopic techniques.

This study reports the first prospective randomized comparison of the different surgical techniques.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
29
Inclusion Criteria
  • Splenic artery aneurysm with diameter greater than 2 cm
  • Splenic artery aneurysm with diameter smaller than 2 cm if risk factors for rupture are associated (child bearing age, pregnancy, blister or saccular shape, increasing diameter)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Complex aneurysm involving the celiac trunk
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score > 3

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
LaparoscopyLaparoscopic splenic aneurysm repair, eventual splenectomyIncludes all patient underwent intervention with a laparoscopic approach, even if converted to open surgery during intervention
Open surgeryLaparotomic splenic artery aneurysm repair, eventual artery reconstruction or splenectomyIncludes all the patients underwent intervention with a laparotomic approach; it does not include patient underwent laparoscopic approach and then converted in laparotomy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall postoperative morbidity rateDuring and after hospital stay, an expected average of 50 months

According to Dindo-Clavien classification of postoperative complication, we collect in a prospective way and classify all the possible complication by direct clinical evaluation and additional blood sample, imaging or endoscopy if required.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Resumption of oral dietPartcipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of one week

Time between the intervention and patient oral intake without problems

Intra-abdominal surgical drain removal timePartcipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of one week

Time between intervention and removal of surgical drain

Hospital stay lengthPartcipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of one week

Time between intervention and discharge

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili di Brescia

🇮🇹

Brescia, BS, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath