Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02413476
NCT02413476
Unknown
Phase 2

Compared With Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer on Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes

wei bo0 sites120 target enrollmentMay 2015
ConditionsGastric Cancer

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Gastric Cancer
Sponsor
wei bo
Enrollment
120
Primary Endpoint
Five-year disease free survival rate
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study aims to compare the clinical outcomes between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer,and evaluate the the feasibility and safety of robotic gastrectomy. Furthermore, the investigators can explore the patients who are more suitable for robotic gastrectomy.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective study lasting 36 months. Minimally invasive gastrectomy is accepted widely in Asian countries. Laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy offers improved early postoperative outcomes and improved long-term oncologic outcomes,but it still has its own limitations.The advantages of robotic surgery include a 3D imagine, convenient movements of the robotic arm, no tremor, and ambidextrous capability. This study therefore aimed to compare the clinical results between robotic-assisted gastrectomy(RAG) using the da Vinci Surgical System and conventional laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy(LAG) in gastric cancer patients.To evaluate the the feasibility and safety of robotic gastrectomy and explore the patients who are more suitable for robotic gastrectomy.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2015
End Date
May 2018
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
wei bo
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

wei bo

Vice Director of the general surgery department, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Chinese PLA General Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Pathologically proven gastric cancer(early or advanced).
  • Age:older than 18 years old,younger than 80 years old.
  • cT1-4a(surgically resectable tumor),N0-3,M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual Seventh Edition
  • No obvious surgical contraindications.
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score class I, II, or III
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe mental disorder
  • History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
  • History of previous gastrectomy,endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection.
  • History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months
  • History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • History of other malignant disease within past 5 years.
  • Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node diameter over 3cm by preoperative imaging
  • Any accompanying surgical condition needed to be performed in the same time

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Five-year disease free survival rate

Time Frame: Up to 5 years post-operative

Secondary Outcomes

  • Postoperative recovery course (time to first ambulation,flatus,liquid diet and soft diet,post-operative stay)(7 days)
  • Mortality(30 days)
  • Operating time(1 day)
  • Intraoperative situation (The number of lymph node dissection,the number of positive lymph nodes,extra-cavity anastomosis time,intraoperative blood loss,the rate of conversion)(1 day)
  • Complication (score based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system)(30 days)
  • Hospitalization expenses(30 days)
  • Quality of life(Up to 5 years post-operative)
  • Five-year overall survival rate(Up to 5 years post-operative)
  • Readmissions and recurrence rate(Up to 5 years post-operative)

Similar Trials