MedPath

Unilateral Stenting Versus Bilateral Stenting for Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Gallbladder Carcinoma
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Cholangiocarcinoma
Interventions
Device: biliary stent
Registration Number
NCT02649712
Lead Sponsor
Xuzhou Central Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness and long-term outcomes between patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction who are treated by unilateral or bilateral stenting.

Detailed Description

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction is a common clinical manifestation and it can be caused by cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, liver cancer, or other metastatic carcinoma. Most patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction are unresectable at diagnosis. Biliary stenting has been widely used in palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

Hilar biliary obstruction usually involves the bifurcation of the biliary tract. Some researchers recommended unilateral stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction because drainage of 25% of entire liver can achieve the clinical success of biliary drainage. However, some researchers recommended bilateral stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction because some researches demonstrated that bilateral stenting can achieve a longer stent patency.In addition, there was no significant difference in post stenting survival between patients who were treated by unilateral or bilateral stenting. Therefore, it remains under debate whether unilateral or bilateral stenting is better in the treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness and long-term outcomes between patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction who are treated by unilateral or bilateral stenting.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
72
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Malignant hilar biliary obstruction;
  2. Unresectable cases
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Bismuth I patients;
  2. inability to obtain informed consent;
  3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 4;
  4. severe dysfunction in other organs.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Unilateral stentbiliary stentPatients undergo placement of unilateral biliary stent on day 1.
Bilateral stentsbiliary stentPatients undergo placement of bilateral biliary stents on day 1.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Stent patency (Stent dysfunction is suspected when the patient experiences recurrence of jaundice)From the date of randomization until the date of first documented stent dysfunction, assessed up to 10 months

Stent dysfunction is suspected when the patient experiences recurrence of jaundice.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall survivalFrom the date of randomization until the date of first documented death from any cause, assessed up to 12 months

From the date of randomization until the date of first documented death from any cause.

Stent dysfunction free-patient survivalFrom the date of randomization until the date of first documented stent dysfunction or the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 months.

From the date of randomization until the date of first documented stent dysfunction or the date of death from any cause, whichever came first.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Xuzhou Central Hospital

🇨🇳

Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath