跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2026/02/105062
CTRI/2026/02/105062尚未招募不适用

A Comparative Study of Continuous Epidural Analgesia Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia in Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgeries

CHRI1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2026年3月16日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
40
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Postoperative pain management plays a crucial role in enhancing recovery and reducing complications following abdominal surgeries. Continuous Epidural Analgesia (CEA) and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) are commonly used modalities for postoperative pain relief, each with its own advantages and limitations. This prospective randomized comparative study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.

All patients will receive standardized general anaesthesia. Postoperatively, one group will receive continuous epidural infusion of local anaesthetic with opioid, while the other group will receive intravenous morphine through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, quality of recovery, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse effects will be assessed and compared between the two groups.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Adults aged 18-70 years, ASA physical status I-III undergoing elective abdominal surgeries.
  • Patients able to communicate pain intensity effectively and operate the PCA device independently.

排除标准

  • Allergy to study drugs, coagulopathy or anticoagulation therapy, and infection at the insertion site.

研究者

发起方
CHRI
申办方类型
Research institution and hospital
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sri Giridharini

Chettinad hospital and research institute

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验