Skip to main content
MedPath Trial logoMedPath TrialMedPath Trial Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2025/12/098852
CTRI/2025/12/098852Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Comparative study of ease of endotracheal intubation using Millers blade by para glossal approach and C MAC video laryngoscope in adult patients with simulated difficult airway : a one year randomised clinical trial

Dr.Sushma Tumati1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: January 10, 2026Last updated:
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Study OverviewStudy DesignEligibility CriteriaInvestigatorsSitesRecords & IdentifiersSimilar Trials

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Endotracheal intubation is the most common definitive airway during general anaesthesia. Airway management failure can cause serious harm making laryngoscopy essential for safe intubation. Video laryngoscope like c mac enhance glottic view while millers blade with paraglossal approach also improves visualization in difficult airway. This study compares both techniques to determine which provides easier intubation in simulated difficult airway conditions.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Masking
Participant Blinded

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 65.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Inclusion Criteria:
  • •Adult patients of either sex 2.Age 18 to 65 years 3.ASA physical status 1 and 2 4.No history of difficult airway but able to undergo simulated airway condition, Schedule for elective surgeries under general endotracheal Anaesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Exclusion Criteria:
  • •History of difficult intubation 2.High aspiration risk
  • •Anatomical abnormalities.

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr.Sushma Tumati
Sponsor Class
Other [self]
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Sushma Tumati

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
It is a study to compare success rate of endotracheal intubation through BlockBusterTM LMA in right versus left lateral decubitus position
CTRI/2024/09/073828Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care50
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
To Evaluate Cuff pressure in adults undergoing Open and Laparoscopic surgeries and associated postoperative complaints
CTRI/2025/07/090398Government of Gujarat80
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A Comparative study between the effects of two doses of nebulized Dexmedetomidine as premedication in attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in a tertiary care hospital
CTRI/2025/09/094340Dr D G Rakshitha120
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
MAKING BREATHING TUBE PLACEMENT EASIER: COMPARING FLAT AND HALF SITTING POSITION IN ADULT SURGERY PATIENTS USING A CAMERA ASSISTED DEVICE
CTRI/2025/09/094708Dr Prakathi P74
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison between non channeled blade with channeled blade of videolaryngoscope for securing the airway
CTRI/2024/03/064685Seth GSMC and KEMH80