Single operator versus two operators in ultrasound guided central venous access in neonates and infants
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- AnaesthesiaCirculatory SystemPaediatrics
- Registration Number
- PACTR202101771187923
- Lead Sponsor
- faculty of medicine mansoura university
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
aged less than 2 years
both genders
need for central line insertion
Exclusion Criteria
•Refusal of their guardians
•Pervious central venous cannulation,
•Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders,
•History of failed vein cannulation
•Occurrence of any mechanical complication during the failed trial,
•Local infection at the site of puncture,
•distorted anatomy of the clavicle or the neck, underlying pleural effusion or pneumothorax and
•After 3 attempts of the skin puncture with the introducing needle.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying ultrasound-guided central venous access in neonatal anaesthesia?
How does single operator technique compare to two operators in managing circulatory challenges during paediatric procedures?
What biomarkers could predict successful central venous access in infants with congenital circulatory disorders?
What adverse events are associated with ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in neonates and how are they managed?
Are there alternative interventions to ultrasound-guided central venous access for neonatal and infant critical care?