MedPath

Pushing and Manual Perineal Protection Techniques

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Labor Complication
Episiotomy Extended by Laceration
Perineal Tear
Interventions
Procedure: Uncoached pushing and Hands-poised perineal protection
Procedure: Coached pushing and Finnish manual perineal protection
Registration Number
NCT04823598
Lead Sponsor
Istinye University
Brief Summary

Perineal trauma during vaginal delivery is very common, especially in countries with a high prevalence of episiotomy. Perineal traumas can range from tears limited to the skin, subcutaneous and vaginal mucosa to severe tears involving the anal sphincter and rectal mucosa. Perineal trauma is associated with short-term morbidities such as bleeding, infection, pain, edema. Besides, it may cause long-term morbidities such as urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, dyspareunia, a decrease in quality of life, a need for surgery, and psychosocial problems. Moreover, it is associated with an increase in national healthcare costs and malpractice cases. For these reasons, some measures to reduce the frequency of perineal trauma have been discussed for many years. Pushing techniques applied in the second stage of labor and manual perineum protection techniques applied during fetal expulsion are among these. Current data are insufficient to make definitive recommendations. In this study, it was aimed to compare different pushing and perineal protection techniques in the second stage of labor.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
164
Inclusion Criteria
  • Nulliparity
  • 37-40 weeks of gestation
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Vertex presentation
  • Risk-free pregnancy
  • Estimated fetal weight 2500-4000 g
  • In the first stage of birth
  • Amniotic membranes are intact
  • Adequate knowledge of written and spoken Turkish
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Cesarean delivery need
  • Need for labor induction
  • Need for operative delivery (vacuum, forceps)
  • Need for obstetric analgesia
  • Kristaller maneuver
  • Perineal preparation during pregnancy (perineal massage in the last month of pregnancy, etc.)
  • Vulvo-vaginal infection
  • Vulvar severe varicose veins
  • Postpartum atony
  • Non-compliance with research follow-up criteria
  • Covid-19 positivity
  • Non-compliance with the procedure of the group involved
  • Neuropsychiatric and other diseases that cause understanding, speech, and expression disorders
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Study groupUncoached pushing and Hands-poised perineal protectionUncoached pushing and Hands-poised perineal protection
Reference groupCoached pushing and Finnish manual perineal protectionCoached pushing and Finnish manual perineal protection
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Episiotomybetween the end of the second stage of labor and fetal expulsion

Episiotomy rates

Perineal lacerationsbetween the end of the second stage of labor and fetal expulsion

Frequency of perineal lacerations according to their severity

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Perineal pain24th hour after birth

Average pain score obtained by the Visual Analog Scale

Breastfeeding24th hour after birth

Average score obtained by the Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool

Pelvic muscle function1th month after birth

Mean scores obtained by the "PERFECT scheme" regarding pelvic floor muscle function (total and subscale scores)

Maternal birth satisfaction24th hour after birth

Average score obtained by the Birth Satisfaction Scale

Anal incontinence1th month after birth

Mean anal incontinence score obtained by Wexner scale

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Gaziosmanpaşa Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath