Pushing and Manual Perineal Protection Techniques
- Conditions
- Labor ComplicationEpisiotomy Extended by LacerationPerineal Tear
- Interventions
- Procedure: Uncoached pushing and Hands-poised perineal protectionProcedure: Coached pushing and Finnish manual perineal protection
- Registration Number
- NCT04823598
- Lead Sponsor
- Istinye University
- Brief Summary
Perineal trauma during vaginal delivery is very common, especially in countries with a high prevalence of episiotomy. Perineal traumas can range from tears limited to the skin, subcutaneous and vaginal mucosa to severe tears involving the anal sphincter and rectal mucosa. Perineal trauma is associated with short-term morbidities such as bleeding, infection, pain, edema. Besides, it may cause long-term morbidities such as urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, dyspareunia, a decrease in quality of life, a need for surgery, and psychosocial problems. Moreover, it is associated with an increase in national healthcare costs and malpractice cases. For these reasons, some measures to reduce the frequency of perineal trauma have been discussed for many years. Pushing techniques applied in the second stage of labor and manual perineum protection techniques applied during fetal expulsion are among these. Current data are insufficient to make definitive recommendations. In this study, it was aimed to compare different pushing and perineal protection techniques in the second stage of labor.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 164
- Nulliparity
- 37-40 weeks of gestation
- Singleton pregnancy
- Vertex presentation
- Risk-free pregnancy
- Estimated fetal weight 2500-4000 g
- In the first stage of birth
- Amniotic membranes are intact
- Adequate knowledge of written and spoken Turkish
- Cesarean delivery need
- Need for labor induction
- Need for operative delivery (vacuum, forceps)
- Need for obstetric analgesia
- Kristaller maneuver
- Perineal preparation during pregnancy (perineal massage in the last month of pregnancy, etc.)
- Vulvo-vaginal infection
- Vulvar severe varicose veins
- Postpartum atony
- Non-compliance with research follow-up criteria
- Covid-19 positivity
- Non-compliance with the procedure of the group involved
- Neuropsychiatric and other diseases that cause understanding, speech, and expression disorders
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Study group Uncoached pushing and Hands-poised perineal protection Uncoached pushing and Hands-poised perineal protection Reference group Coached pushing and Finnish manual perineal protection Coached pushing and Finnish manual perineal protection
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Episiotomy between the end of the second stage of labor and fetal expulsion Episiotomy rates
Perineal lacerations between the end of the second stage of labor and fetal expulsion Frequency of perineal lacerations according to their severity
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Perineal pain 24th hour after birth Average pain score obtained by the Visual Analog Scale
Breastfeeding 24th hour after birth Average score obtained by the Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool
Pelvic muscle function 1th month after birth Mean scores obtained by the "PERFECT scheme" regarding pelvic floor muscle function (total and subscale scores)
Maternal birth satisfaction 24th hour after birth Average score obtained by the Birth Satisfaction Scale
Anal incontinence 1th month after birth Mean anal incontinence score obtained by Wexner scale
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Gaziosmanpaşa Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
🇹🇷Istanbul, Turkey