Virtual Reality and Spinal Stimulation to Improve Arm Function
- Conditions
- Tetraplegia
- Interventions
- Other: Active (Virtual reality and spinal stimulation)
- Registration Number
- NCT05065437
- Lead Sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Brief Summary
The main objective of our work is to develop and test the safety and feasibility of a home-based upper limb rehabilitation program for individuals with tetraplegia. The program will consist of simultaneous non-invasive spinal cord stimulation and immersive virtual exercises of the upper limbs, with a focus on shoulder and elbow function.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- incomplete low tetraplegia (C5-8; [ASIA] classification B-D),
- free of contraindications to transspinal stimulation,
- more than one-year post-injury,
- stable medication regimen for the past month,
- utilization of wheelchair as a primary mode of mobility (>75% of the time). -
- Neurologic injury other than spinal cord injury
- severe medical illness.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Virtual reality and spinal stimulation Active (Virtual reality and spinal stimulation) Safety and feasibility of a virtual reality and spinal stimulation intervention will be tested.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in medical status Baseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks Safety of the intervention will be assessed as the number of participants who experience a reduction in medical stability and/or functionality from before to after the intervention.
Acceptability of the treatment Post intervention, approximately 4 weeks Acceptability of the treatment will be assessed using the Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form. Items are scored using a 5-point scale, with 1 equaling strongly disagree and 5 equaling strongly agree. TEI-SF scores can range from 9 to 45, with higher scores representing greater acceptance of the treatment.
Usability of the treatment Post intervention, approximately 4 weeks Usability of the treatment will be assessed using the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) Questionnaire. Items are rated on a seven-point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. A higher scale score indicates higher usability.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in clinical muscle strength Baseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks Clinical muscle strength will be assessed using the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) Upper Extremity Motor Score. Motor strength is rated on a 6 point scale with higher ratings indicating greater strength.
Change in current pain intensity Baseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks Current pain intensity will be assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their current pain (multiple types of pain) on a 0-10 scale (0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst possible pain").
Change in upper limb function Baseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks Upper limb function will be assessed using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). The SCIM is composed of 19 items that assess function. SCIM scores range from 0 to 100.
Change in affect Baseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks Affect will be assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The PANAS is a 20-item measure that measures the intensity of 20 emotions on a 0-5 scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely."
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
🇺🇸Richmond, Virginia, United States