MedPath

Virtual Reality and Spinal Stimulation to Improve Arm Function

Not Applicable
Withdrawn
Conditions
Tetraplegia
Interventions
Other: Active (Virtual reality and spinal stimulation)
Registration Number
NCT05065437
Lead Sponsor
Virginia Commonwealth University
Brief Summary

The main objective of our work is to develop and test the safety and feasibility of a home-based upper limb rehabilitation program for individuals with tetraplegia. The program will consist of simultaneous non-invasive spinal cord stimulation and immersive virtual exercises of the upper limbs, with a focus on shoulder and elbow function.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  1. incomplete low tetraplegia (C5-8; [ASIA] classification B-D),
  2. free of contraindications to transspinal stimulation,
  3. more than one-year post-injury,
  4. stable medication regimen for the past month,
  5. utilization of wheelchair as a primary mode of mobility (>75% of the time). -
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Neurologic injury other than spinal cord injury
  2. severe medical illness.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Virtual reality and spinal stimulationActive (Virtual reality and spinal stimulation)Safety and feasibility of a virtual reality and spinal stimulation intervention will be tested.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in medical statusBaseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks

Safety of the intervention will be assessed as the number of participants who experience a reduction in medical stability and/or functionality from before to after the intervention.

Acceptability of the treatmentPost intervention, approximately 4 weeks

Acceptability of the treatment will be assessed using the Treatment Evaluation Inventory-Short Form. Items are scored using a 5-point scale, with 1 equaling strongly disagree and 5 equaling strongly agree. TEI-SF scores can range from 9 to 45, with higher scores representing greater acceptance of the treatment.

Usability of the treatmentPost intervention, approximately 4 weeks

Usability of the treatment will be assessed using the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use (USE) Questionnaire. Items are rated on a seven-point scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. A higher scale score indicates higher usability.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in clinical muscle strengthBaseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks

Clinical muscle strength will be assessed using the American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) Upper Extremity Motor Score. Motor strength is rated on a 6 point scale with higher ratings indicating greater strength.

Change in current pain intensityBaseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks

Current pain intensity will be assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their current pain (multiple types of pain) on a 0-10 scale (0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst possible pain").

Change in upper limb functionBaseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks

Upper limb function will be assessed using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). The SCIM is composed of 19 items that assess function. SCIM scores range from 0 to 100.

Change in affectBaseline to post intervention, approximately 4 weeks

Affect will be assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). The PANAS is a 20-item measure that measures the intensity of 20 emotions on a 0-5 scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely."

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Virginia Commonwealth University

🇺🇸

Richmond, Virginia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath