A comparison of anatomically aligned versus conventional in unilateral total knee arthroplasty
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Diseases of the musculo-skeletal system and connective tissue
- Registration Number
- KCT0004519
- Lead Sponsor
- The Catholic University of Korea Catholic Medical Center
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 102
Inclusion Criteria
Patients for bilateral total knee arthroplasty
- having medicare insurance
Exclusion Criteria
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Other inflammatory arthritis
- Crystal-induced arthritis
- Septic arthritis
- Neuropsychiatric patients
- Previous knee operation history
- Neuropsychiatric patients
- Patients with preoperative severe limitation of motion (Flexion contracture = 20, range of motion = 90)
- Patients with preoperative severe defomity of knee alignment (Varus or valgus angle = 15)
- Severe obese patients (BMI = 40)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional Study
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual pain scale;radiologic parameter (alignment & component)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index);Forgotten Joint Score;Patient Satisfaction New Knee Society Score