跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05214131
NCT05214131终止不适用

Randomized Study Of Novel Enuresis Alarm (GoGoband® )Vs Standard Nocturnal Enuresis Alarm (SNEA)

Yale University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 16 人开始时间: 2022年4月29日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
16
试验地点
1
主要终点
Number of Wet Nights

研究概览

简要总结

Identify the dry night rate in patients using the GoGoband® nocturnal enuresis device vs a standard Pflaundler bedwetting alarm.

详细描述

3.1 Problem Statement At the present time, there are no side-by-side comparison studies of GoGoband® vs SNEA. Since many of the prior studies were conducted using variable outcome parameters that makes direct comparisons of studies difficult it would be beneficial to obtain comparable data from the 2 groups and compare dry night rates for the 2 devices.

3.2 Purpose of Study/Potential Impact Our preliminary quality improvement data indicates that the GoGoband® is more efficacious than both medication and SNEA in an uncontrolled environment when deidentified data was analyzed off our servers. Our present database does not allow us to discern if patients are monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (MNE) or non monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (NMNE). Without this ability as well as for controlling for behavioral and academic problems which are known to affect outcomes in nocturnal enuresis studies, the investigators are not able to compare our results definitively and accurately to other treatment modalities.

Hypothesis Our hypothesis is that the GoGoband® is more effective than SNEA and Desmopressin in the treatment of Nocturnal Enuresis Primary Objective The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the GoGoband®] is as effective or more effective in comparison to children who use SNEA in a population of MNE patients with no underlying Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a 3 month period.

Secondary Objectives

To ascertain if familial incidence of nocturnal enuresis has an effect on outcomes

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
6 Years 至 21 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • •Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • •Male or female, aged 6 to 21 years
  • •In good general health as evidenced by medical history and diagnosed with MNE
  • •Ability to and be willing to adhere to the treatment regimen. -

排除标准

  • •No patient may have had treatment of MNE in the past 6 months whether with medications or alarms
  • •Current use of on ADHD medications, Tricyclics, SSRI's, NRI's or any antipsychotic medications.
  • •Presence of Autistic Spectrum disorder, ADHD, genetic syndrome associated with developmental or learning disabilities
  • •Treatment with another investigational drug or other intervention within last 6 months
  • •Any form of Diabetes Mellitus or Diabetes Insipidus
  • •No patient with known Chronic renal disease with moderate to severe renal impairment (defined as a creatinine clearance below 50mL/min).
  • •No patient with known hyponatremia or a history of hyponatremia.

研究组 & 干预措施

gogoband alarm

Experimental

patients will be assigned to the novel bedwetting alarm

干预措施: gogoband (Device)

standard nocturnal enuresis alarm (SNEA) group

Active Comparator

this is the standard bedwetting alarm that is presently available through out the world

干预措施: SNEA group (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Wet Nights

时间窗: 3 month period

Comparison of alarms are to determine whether the GoGoband®\] is as effective or more effective in comparison to children who use SNEA in a population of MNE patients with no underlying ADHD. The number of wet nights in each group will be compared to each other providing a comparison of the data. The data will be compared using either a T test or Kruskal Wallis or anova depending on the number of comparisons performed and the data distribution is normal or not. If patient numbers are less than 10 per group no statistical analysis will be performed.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验