Communication Issues in Patient/Provider Discussions of Immunotherapy
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Interview
- Conditions
- Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System Neoplasm
- Sponsor
- Emory University
- Enrollment
- 125
- Locations
- 3
- Primary Endpoint
- Misestimations about the risks and benefits of immunotherapy resulting from media hype or other sources
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 26 days ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This trials studies communication issues in patient and provider discussions about immunotherapy. The goal of this study is to describe where patients have heard about immunotherapy, what the participants understand about it, how physicians and other healthcare workers describe immunotherapy, and how educational videos may support patient knowledge about immunotherapy.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To identify misestimations about the risks and benefits of immunotherapy resulting from media hype or other sources and assess if these misestimations persist post-provider conversation about immunotherapy. II. To qualitatively describe patient reported misunderstandings and to assess patient understanding of technical terms and metaphors used in the immunotherapy conversation. III. To identify provider and patient preferences for information to be communicated about immunotherapy. IV. Develop videos that describe immunotherapy and test their efficacy in improving understanding using pre and post methodology. OUTLINE: Patients and their providers undergo observation during a conversation about immunotherapy. Then participate in an interview over 20 minutes. Understanding of educational videos is then tested.
Investigators
Rebecca D. Pentz
Principal Investigator
Emory University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •AIMS 1-3: All patients and providers who may have a discussion about immunotherapy at the Winship Cancer Institute
- •AIM 4: Any cancer patient
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Arms & Interventions
Interview
Patients and providers undergo observation during a conversation about immunotherapy. Then participate in an interview over 20 minutes.
Intervention: Interview
Interview
Patients and providers undergo observation during a conversation about immunotherapy. Then participate in an interview over 20 minutes.
Intervention: Observation
Aim 4 tests an educational video
The participants watch a video and their comprehension is tested in a pre and post methodology
Intervention: Educational video
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Misestimations about the risks and benefits of immunotherapy resulting from media hype or other sources
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Will use descriptive statistics to summarize the demographic characteristics and responses to the interviews. Will audio-record and transcribe the provider conversation for immunotherapy and the pre- and post-provider conversation interviews. The transcripts will be qualitatively coded using multi-level semantic analysis in MAXQDA. Pre-determined codes will include a list of potential benefits of immunotherapy, any patient estimation of the potential for benefit, any side effect and risk mentioned and any estimation of its frequency. Because there is no data on the frequency of misestimations due to media hype, no quantitative analysis is planned.
Correct definition rates (pre- versus post-video)
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
Before-video and after-video correct definition rates will be calculated, along with 95% exact binomial confidence intervals using the Clopper-Pearson method. Before and after paired rates will be compared using an exact McNemar's test. Subset analyses will be performed for gender, age group (=\< 55, \> 55), and education level (high school graduate or less, some college or more).
Qualitatively describe patient reported misunderstandings
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
During the observed conversation, the ethics team member will note any technical term or metaphor used. The patient will then be asked if each term and metaphor is understood. The open ended questions about misunderstanding, technical terms and metaphors used, and patients' understanding of each term will be qualitatively coded using multi-level semantic analysis in MAXQDA. Frequency of misunderstood terms and misunderstood metaphors will be calculated.
Provider and patient preferences for information to be communicated about immunotherapy
Time Frame: Up to 4 years
The frequencies of each item of information identified by providers and patients will be determined. A combined list of the most frequently mentioned items of information to be included and a discussion of immunotherapy will be compiled.