Systematic Use of Telepsychiatry for Outpatients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 34
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Patients' experiences regarding the use of VC
研究概览
简要总结
Implementation and evaluation of video consultation in psychiatric outpatient treatment. The study will focus on patients' experiences regarding the use of VC. The study will also examine important aspects of the telepsychiatric consultation such as therapeutic alliance, consultation content, psychopathology and satisfaction levels compared to face-to-face consultations.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •age > 18 years
- •Danish-speaking.
排除标准
- •Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, or suffering from substance abuse.
- •Additionally, Participants in the VC group were excluded if they did not have a smartphone, tablet, laptop, or personal computer with a webcam.
结局指标
主要结局
Patients' experiences regarding the use of VC
时间窗: Two months
Semistructured interviews have been conducted to evaluate participants' experience regarding the use of VC technology in clinical practice.
Patients' well-being, assessed by World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
时间窗: Two months.
Well-being level is evaluated with the mean change scores in the WHO-5 questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher well-being
Patients' function, assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
时间窗: Two months.
Functional impairment is evaluated with the mean change scores in the SDS questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 0 to 30. lower scores indicate lower functional impairment
The demand for video consultation (VC) in clinical practice.
时间窗: One year
The demand for VC is evaluated by the percentage of included participants who chose to be in the VC group and the actual use of VC consultation sessions during the study period, including the number of missed appointments and the number of times VC sessions have been converted to telephone or in-person (IP) consultations.
Patients' satisfaction, assessed by client satisfaction questionnaire 8 (CSQ-8)
时间窗: Two months.
Satisfaction is evaluated with the mean change scores in the CSQ-8 questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 8 to 32. Higher scores indicate a higher satisfaction
Patient recovery, assessed by INSPIRE
时间窗: Two months.
Patient recovery is evaluated with the mean change scores in the INSPIRE questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates higher recovery
Patients' therapeutic alliance, assessed by working alliance inventory- client version (WAI-C)
时间窗: Two months.
Therapeutic alliance is evaluated with the mean change scores in the WAI-C questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate a higher therapeutic alliance
The implementation and integration of VC in clinical practice, as assessed by a checklist developed for the case managers (CM).
时间窗: One year
The following properties are used to evaluate the implementation and integration properties: 1. type of technology patients use for VC sessions (Smartphone/tablet or personal computer/laptop) 2. patients' physical location during VC session (Home or outdoor) 3. the VC sessions confidentiality (Alone or with other persons) 4. duration of VC session 5. the content of the VC sessions (supportive, therapy, medication management, crisis/acute or "mix" content) Descriptive statistics will be applied to evaluate the implementation and integration properties.
Patients' Symptom level, assessed by Symptom Checklist -10 (SCL-10)
时间窗: Two months.
Symptom level is evaluated with the mean change scores in the SCL-10 questionnaire at baseline and posttreatment. Score ranging: from 0 to 100. Lower score indicates lower psychological distress
次要结局
未报告次要终点