Bumetanide vs. Furosemide in Cirrhosis
- Registration Number
- NCT06941415
- Lead Sponsor
- Stacy Johnson
- Brief Summary
Patients with cirrhosis are frequently hospitalized due to an acute decompensation of their liver disease including bleeding, jaundice, encephalopathy, and volume overload. Volume overload is associated with increased mortality from acute hypoxic respiratory failure, hemorrhage from esophageal varices, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
Clinical practice guidelines describe sodium restriction and diuretics as first-line treatment, combined with regular body weight monitoring to assess response. In patients with suboptimal response to furosemide, alternative loop diuretics like torsemide or bumetanide may improve natriuresis. Bumetanide has a theoretic advantage over furosemide due to its more rapid and complete intestinal absorption, combined with a prolonged half-life in patients with hepatic dysfunction. In this pragmatic study, the aim is to compare the efficacy of diuresis with bumetanide versus furosemide among hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 500
- History of liver cirrhosis
- Clinician placed an order for bumetanide or furosemide in electronic health record within 24 hours of presentation to the hospital
- Allergy to bumetanide or furosemide
- Contraindication to diuretic administration (e.g. active bleeding, clinical suspicion of hepatorenal syndrome, hypotension)
- Incarcerated or in custody of law enforcement
- Diuretic ordered for purpose other than volume overload (e.g. hyperkalemia, continuation of home medication without clinical signs of volume overload)
- Inpatient admission not anticipated
- Not admitted to an inpatient hospital bed following initial evaluation in the emergency department
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Bumetanide Bumetanide - Furosemide Furosemide -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent change in weight 7 days Percent change in weight measured in kilograms from date of emergency department presentation (Day 0) to Day 7 of hospitalization, or date of discharge, whichever is earlier
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Development of acute kidney injury 14 days Stage 2 or higher acute kidney injury developing within 14 days of presentation to emergency department in accordance with KDIGO criteria
Need for replacement therapy 14 days New initiation of intermittent or continuous hemodialysis within 14 days of presentation to the emergency department
Severe electrolyte derangement 14 days New decrease in serum potassium to less than 2.5 mEq/L within 14 days of presentation to the emergency department
Hospital length of stay 30 days Time from initial presentation to the emergency department to the time of discharge from the hospital or time of death, if a subject dies within the hospital
Unplanned hospital readmission 30 days Readmission to the hospital for an unexpected reason within 30 days of a prior hospital admission
30-day mortality 30 days Death occurring within the 30 days following presentation to the emergency department and subsequent hospital admission
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Utah Hospital
🇺🇸Salt Lake City, Utah, United States