MedPath

Manual Diaphragm Release Technique Effects On Tidal Volume in Elderly

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Healthy
Interventions
Other: The manual diaphragm release technique
Other: Sham manual diaphragm release technique
Registration Number
NCT01975740
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Brief Summary

Question: Does manual diaphragm release change kinematics and respiratory function of elderly subjects? Design: Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation and double-blinding.

Participants: 17 volunteers over 60 years old randomized into two groups: 09 in the Control Group (CG) and 08 in the Intervention Group (IG).

Intervention: The manual diaphragm release technique was used on the IG, in two sets of ten deep breaths, with a one minute interval between them. The CG underwent a sham protocol (light touch), with same sets and time of interval.

Outcome measures: The groups were evaluated using spirometry, manovacuometry and optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP), in that order, before and immediately after the intervention.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
18
Inclusion Criteria
  • over 60 years of age;
  • a body mass index (BMI) below 30 kg/m2
  • non-smokers, self-declared sedentary;
  • presenting a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than or equal to 80% of predicted;
  • the ratio between these variables (FEV1/FVC) greater than 70% in spirometry
Exclusion Criteria
  • Showed the inability to understand verbal commands in the evaluation.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Manual diaphragm release techniqueThe manual diaphragm release technique-
Sham manual diaphragm release techniqueSham manual diaphragm release technique-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Compartmental chest wall distributionbefore first session

The analysis of the regional distribution of respiratory volumes was done with Optoelectronic plethysmography (BTS Bioengineering, Italy), in which 89 reflective markers were adhered to the skin of volunteers using hypoallergenic adhesives, on particular anatomical points of the chest wall and abdomen (Aliverti and Pedotti 2003). The device emitted an infrared light on the reflective markers which was captured by eight cameras around the room, allowing the spatial determination of each marker. Thus, changes in lung volumes were calculated at each of the three compartments of the rib cage: pulmonary or upper ribcage (Rc, p), abdominal or lower ribcage (Rc, a) and abdomen (Ab). After the first OEP evaluation, a nontoxic, hypoallergenic pen was used to mark the placement of the dorsal reflective markers allowing the patient to lay in supine for the manual technique or the sham. The markers were then placed at the exact same anatomical points for reevaluation.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pulmonary FunctionBefore first session

To assess the participant's lung function, a portable Micro Loop 8 (Micromedical, England) spirometer was used to evaluate the forced maneuver (Miller et al 2005). The study followed the criteria of acceptability in accordance with the ATS/ERS (2005). Values of FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and FEV1/FVC were obtained.

Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressuresBefore first session

The maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP, MEP) were obtained from the residual volume and total lung capacity, respectively, according to the criteria of the ATS/ERS (ATS/ERS, 2002) and measured using a portable digital manometer, model MVD 300 (® MDI Ltd., Brazil).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Federal University of Pernambuco

🇧🇷

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath