跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/03/063613
CTRI/2024/03/063613招募中Unknown

"A Comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical Luliconazole versus topical Ciclopirox olamine among patients with Tinea corporis/cruris"

Pradeep1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2024年3月16日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
Unknown
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
Primary effectiveness is assessed based on percentage of patients achieving complete clearance. Complete clearance is defined as achieving both clinical response and mycological cure.

研究概览

简要总结

Topical antifungal drugs are commonly employed in Tinea corporis/cruris.

Several tertiary centers frequently prescribe luliconazole for its broad spectrum and anti-inflammatory property. It is expensive, and relapse are documented.

There is need of antifungals with diverse modes of action, as well as those that are affordable and less risk of relapse.

Ciclopirox olamine inhibits enzymes necessary for fungal cellular activity. It has additional antibacterial properties which help treating superadded infections.

There are very few studies comparing Luliconazole and ciclopirox olamine in the treatment of Tinea corporis/cruris in India.

Hence this study is undertaken to compare Luliconazole versus ciclopirox olamine in the treatment of Tinea corporis and cruris.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients willing to give informed consent and follow up.
  • Patients of either gender aged between 18-60 years.
  • Patients with mild Tinea corporis or cruris and Positive KOH Test.

排除标准

  • Patients with hypersensitivity to study medications.
  • Patients with deep fungal infections.
  • Patients with Tinea unguim, Tinea capitis and Tinea barbae.
  • Psychiatric or emotional disturbance in patients.
  • Diabetic and Immunocompromised patients.

结局指标

主要结局

Primary effectiveness is assessed based on percentage of patients achieving complete clearance. Complete clearance is defined as achieving both clinical response and mycological cure.

时间窗: 0,2,4 weeks

Clinical response is assessed using investigator global evaluation tool based on signs and symptoms which give score ranging from 1 to 5.Where score 1:Healed(absence of signs and symptoms),

时间窗: 0,2,4 weeks

score 2:markedly improved greater than 50% clinical improvement, score 3:considerable residual lesion(less than 50% clinical improvement),score 4(no change from baseline),score 5 :deterioration from baseline .Clinical response will be defined as having scores 1 or 2 (healed or markedly improved)

时间窗: 0,2,4 weeks

Mycological cure is defined by achievement of negative result on KOH mount at the end of the treatment period.

时间窗: 0,2,4 weeks

Change in Total symptom score.

时间窗: 0,2,4 weeks

次要结局

  • Safety is assessed by adverse drug reactions which will be reported in CDSCO form and severity grading will be done.(0,2,4th week)

研究者

发起方
Pradeep
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Praveen Panchaksharimath

Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验