Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02969902
NCT02969902
Completed
N/A

Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Buzzy and Hand-held Computer Distraction for Pain Control in Children Underwent Venipuncture.

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo0 sites200 target enrollmentNovember 2014
ConditionsPain Relief

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pain Relief
Sponsor
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Enrollment
200
Primary Endpoint
Self-reported pain
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Venipuncture is one of the most common iatrogenic painful and stressful procedures performed on children. Interventions aimed at reducing the distress related to this experience are widely and strongly recommended. Pain and anxiety management is even more essential because it may modify children's memory for procedural pain and the subsequent acceptance of later health care painful interventions. Distraction is the most studied psychological technique to relieve venipuncture related pain and distress, with a strong evidence supporting its efficacy in children and adolescents.

In recent years several studies showed the effectiveness of a specific tool named Buzzy® (MMJ Labs, Atlanta GA, USA), in relieving pain and distress in children. Buzzy combines distraction and physical analgesia (vibration and cold) and it was positively tested during venipuncture, intravenous cannulation and painful injections in children. Even though its efficacy it's well established, most of the published trials did not compare Buzzy with other interventions, so that little data are available about its usefulness compared with other distractions techniques.

Hand-held computers are reusable tools, which offer a technological-based active distraction. There is evidence supporting their used during painful procedures such as venipuncture and a recent published study showed that hand-held computer distraction was as effective as nurse-led passive distraction techniques in children.

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Buzzy versus hand-held computer in pain relief during venipuncture.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 2014
End Date
February 2015
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Luca Ronfani

Head of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • children from 4 to 12 years of age needing venipuncture

Exclusion Criteria

  • the presence of damage, denuded or broken skin in the site of Buzzy application;
  • use of topical, enteral or parenteral analgesics within eight hours before enrolment;
  • the presence of cognitive impairment or the inability to report pain verbally;
  • the presence of chronic disease, included epilepsy, or of diseases associated with cold hypersensitivity (i.e., sickle cell anaemia, Raynaud's disease).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Self-reported pain

Time Frame: Within 5 minutes after the procedure

Children from 4 to 7 years of age record their pain using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R); children from 8 to 12 years using a Numerical Rating Scale, with scores from zero to 10.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pain evaluated by parents(Within 5 minutes after the procedure)
  • Success at first attempt(Intraprocedural)
  • Pain evaluated by nurses(Within 5 minutes after the procedure)
  • Adverse events(Up to 15 minutes after the procedure)

Similar Trials