Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05785416
NCT05785416CompletedNot Applicable

Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Joint Range of Motion, Flexibility and Electromyographic Activity of Knee Muscles in Older Adults

Deepak Malhotra1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Active Knee Range of Motion

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial was to compare the effect of two different types of stretching techniques in elderly population. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. What is the immediate effect (after a single intervention) of these stretching techniques on muscle flexibility, amount of knee joint motion and muscle activity?
  2. What is the effect of a four week intervention program of these stretching techniques on muscle flexibility, amount of knee joint motion and muscle activity? There were three groups with ten randomly allocated participants in each group. Intervention group I was given a stretching technique called contract-relax technique and the Intervention group II was given static stretching. The third group was not given any treatment and was taken as a control. The main aim was to find out that whether the two techniques are effective or not and which one of the two is better than the other in terms of improvement in the above mentioned parameters.

Detailed Description

The objective of the study was to compare the effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation - Contract Relax (PNF- CR) and static stretch techniques immediately and post four weeks of intervention on knee range of motion, flexibility and electromyographic activity of knee muscles among older adults. This is an outcome assessor-blinded pre-test post-test randomized controlled trial with two experimental groups (PNF-CR and Static Stretching) and a control group. 30 males aged 55-75 years were randomly assigned into PNF group (n=10), Static Stretch group (n=10) and Control group (n=10). Knee range of motion, electromyographic activity of hamstrings and sit and reach test, were taken for the dominant side thrice: pre-intervention, immediately after stretching and after the training period. Active knee range of motion (ROM) was assessed using a universal goniometer. Surface Electromyography (EMG) was used to record Maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of biceps femoris and the Chair Sit-and-Reach Test (CART) was used to assess the hamstring muscle's length flexibility.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

outcome assessor-blinded pre-test post-test randomized controlled trial

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
55 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Male adults aged between 55 and 75 years
  • •Able to do activities of daily living (ADL) without assistance
  • •Able to comprehend and follow instructions

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Grade III or IV osteoarthritis or any other musculoskeletal condition affecting the muscle length.
  • •History of any surgery to hip, knee, low back or ankle
  • •History of any medication (anti-inflammatory, for pain relief, or anti-arthritic) in previous six months
  • •History of life-threatening disease (neurological disease, cardiovascular disease, severe hypertension)
  • •Passive full knee extension (popliteal angle 180 degrees)

Arms & Interventions

PNF- CR Group

Experimental

The participants in the group were given PNF contract- relax stretching using the standard protocol. One trial had two isometric contractions each followed by five seconds muscle stretch and there was a total of four trials. Total of 12 sessions in 4 weeks (3sessions/week).

Intervention: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Stretching - Contract Relax stretching (PNF-CR) (Other)

Static Stretching Group

Experimental

The participants in the group were given sustained stretching for a period of 80s at a stretch.

Total of 12 sessions in 4 weeks (3sessions/week).

Intervention: Static Stretching (SS) (Other)

Control Group

No Intervention

No intervention was given in this group

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Active Knee Range of Motion

Time Frame: Baseline, After 1st intervention (immediate), 4 weeks after intervention

The active extension knee range of motion was measured using a universal goniometer.

Change in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC)

Time Frame: Baseline, After 1st intervention (immediate), 4 weeks after intervention

The Electromyographic activity of the biceps femoris muscle was evaluated using the surface electrodes during the maximal isometric contraction.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Hamstring flexibility(Baseline, After 1st intervention (immediate), 4 weeks after intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor
Deepak Malhotra
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Deepak Malhotra

Assistant Professor

Jamia Hamdard University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials