Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06595446
NCT06595446
Recruiting
Not Applicable

A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Early vs Late Stent Removal Following Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Formation for Bladder Cancer

Western University, Canada1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentNovember 12, 2024

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Bladder Cancer Requiring Cystectomy
Sponsor
Western University, Canada
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Complication rates
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Bladder cancer is the 4th most common cancer in men and 5th most common type of cancer in Canada. Urothelial cancer accounts for approximately 90% of malignancies. At diagnosis, over 75% of cases are classified as non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), and with appropriate treatment, the majority of these patients achieve positive outcomes. The progression rate of NMIBC to Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) varies between 5-50% at 5 years dependent on histopathological features such as grade, stage, presence of CIS and age (Carcinoma in Situ). The optimal treatment of MIBC (T2-T4N0M0) consists of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (RCUD). In the last couple of decades, RCUD has also gained attention for treating patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and the rise of minimally invasive alternatives, complications after surgery remain frequent, with morbidity rates of approximately 50%.

Several uncertainties persist in surgical practice, including the role of perioperative ureteric stenting during RCUD. Perioperative ureteric stenting is intended to minimize urinary leakage from the newly created uretero-enteric anastomosis and to prevent early obstruction caused by anastomotic swelling. However, stenting may increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and necessitate additional follow-up for stent removal. Peng et al. conducted the most recent systematic review in 2021, demonstrating that ureteral stents in RCUD were linked to higher rates of anastomotic strictures. Their review did not provide evidence that these stents were more effective than not using stents in preventing post-diversion urinary leakage. The review underscored the scarcity of prospective randomized controlled trials examining the safety and effectiveness of stenting in this context. The sole prospective (non-randomized) study assessing stent dwell / retention time after RCUD demonstrated early stent removal (2 weeks) had decreased 90-day readmissions and UTIs.

Therefore, the investigators aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomized trial to evaluate patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation to receive either early stent removal (5-7 days) or late stent removal (4-6 weeks).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 12, 2024
End Date
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Western University, Canada
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nicholas Power

Principal Investigator

Western University, Canada

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients (18 years or older) undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation for bladder cancer
  • Able to give informed written consent to participate.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Treatment without curative intent (cT4b, salvage or palliative cystectomies);
  • Patients undergoing alternative forms of urinary diversion (e.g. continent cutaneous urinary diversion or orthotopic neobladder formation)
  • Patients previously received abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy
  • Patients with concomitant upper urinary tract cancer

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Complication rates

Time Frame: within 30 days:

Feasibility Outcomes

Time Frame: 1 year

1. Recruitment Metrics: * Recruitment Rates: Number of participants recruited versus the number of eligible patients. * Screen Failures: Number of patients screened but found ineligible. * Non-Consenting Rates: Number of eligible patients who decline participation. 2. Protocol Adherence: * Randomization Process Success: Rate of successful randomizations without errors. * Protocol Violations / Deviations: Incidents where clinical needs required deviation from the protocol. * Completion Rate: Proportion of participants who complete the study according to the protocol.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Complication rates(within 1 year)
  • Readmission rates(within 90 days)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials