Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03512730
NCT03512730CompletedPhase 2

BENEFITS OF A NEW MECHANICAL DECONTAMINATION METHOD, TI-BRUSH, ON THE ADJUNCT TREATMENT OF REGENERATIVE THERAPY OF PERI-IMPLANTITIS LESIONS: 12-MONTH OUTCOMES OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya0 sites30 target enrollmentStarted: November 19, 2013Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Completed
Enrollment
30
Primary Endpoint
Evaluate probing pocket depth changes by decontamination of the implant surface with ultrasonics, 3% H2O2, and Ti-Brush™ at 6 and 12 months.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate a new mechanical method (Ti-Brush, Straumann, AG, Basel, Switzerland) of implant surface decontamination.

Material and methods:

A randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial with a 1-year follow-up it is being carried out. After a hygienic phase, defects were randomly assigned to a control (n=18) or to a test group (n=18). In control group, implant surface was decontaminated both mechanically and chemically with 3% H2O2 and plastic ultrasonic scalers, respectively, while in test group Ti-Brush was added. Infrabony defects in both groups were regenerated with BoneCeramic (Straumann, AG, Basel Switzerland) and collagen barrier membrane Cytoplast (Osteogenics, Lubbock, United States). Clinical and radiographic parameters were measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Healthy or treated periodontal patients
  • •A good level of oral hygiene (Plaque Index ≤ 25%) (O'Leary et al., 1972).
  • •Presence of at least one titanium implant exhibiting peri-implantitis (peri-implant bone loss > 30% and Implant PPD ≥ 6 mm with bleeding and/or pus suppuration on probing)
  • •Osseous defect had to be circumferential, or present at least two walls and 3mm depth.
  • •Presence of >1 mm of keratinized peri-implant mucosa
  • •Absence of systemic diseases that could influence the outcome of the therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Pregnant or lactating women
  • •Esthetically compromised patients
  • •Patients who received systemic antibiotics in the past 3 months or treatment of peri-implantitis in the last 12 months.
  • •Smokers of more than 10 cigarettes a day

Arms & Interventions

Titanium brush, H2O2 3%, plastic curettes

Experimental

Intervention: Titanium brush (Device)

Titanium brush, H2O2 3%, plastic curettes

Experimental

Intervention: Classic decontamination (Other)

H2O2 3%, plastic curettes

Active Comparator

Intervention: Classic decontamination (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Evaluate probing pocket depth changes by decontamination of the implant surface with ultrasonics, 3% H2O2, and Ti-Brush™ at 6 and 12 months.

Time Frame: 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Beatriz de Tapia

Associate professor

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Similar Trials