Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT02268019
NCT02268019
Unknown
Not Applicable

A Comparison Between Tourniquet Application and Epinephrine Injection for Hemostasis During Hypospadias Surgery: the Effect on Bleeding and Post-operative Outcome

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences1 site in 1 country70 target enrollmentJanuary 2013
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsHypospadias Repair
Interventionstourniquet applicationepinephrine injection
Drugsepinephrine injection

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
tourniquet application
Conditions
Hypospadias Repair
Sponsor
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Enrollment
70
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Bleeding
Last Updated
11 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaArms & InterventionsOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

A comparison between the two hemostatic methods of hypospadias repairing operation, in terms of early and mid-term (up to 6 months) failure rate (wound dehiscence and urethral stricture needing reoperation) between the two groups: Group A) diluted Epinephrine injection, Group B) tourniquet application in children

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2013
End Date
March 2015
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
Male

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Farshid Alizadeh

Assistant professors of medical science

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •age under 15 Hypospadiasis ( Distal, Midshaft, Proximal)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Bleeding tendency Penoscrotal Hypospadiasis Other method

Arms & Interventions

Hypospadiasis repair

Intervention: tourniquet application

Hypospadiasis repair

Intervention: epinephrine injection

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Bleeding

Time Frame: During surgery

Secondary Outcomes

  • fistula(after surgery for 6 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
The Effect of Two Different Tourniquet Techniques on Peripheral IV Access Success RatesTourniquet
NCT02389725Mayo Clinic121
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison Between Cervical Tourniquet and Uterine Artery Ligation Prior to Segmental Resection ApproachPlacenta Accreta Spectrum
NCT06483724Minia University82
Completed
Not Applicable
Two Mathematical Methods to Estimate Arterial Occlusion Pressure and Tourniquet Effectiveness in Lower Limb SurgeryVascular Diseases
NCT03706859Beni-Suef University77
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques in Hip Resurfacing ArthroplastyOsteonecrosisFemoral Neck FractureImplant Failure
NCT00913679University of Aarhus49
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
A randomized controlled trial-comparison of two types a bleeding-arresting devices (Hemopath vs. Tachosil) in liver operations.Bleeding during liver resection and the efficacy of 2 types of hemostatic patches on this, thus all diagnosis' that require liver resection.MedDRA version: 17.1Level: LLTClassification code 10060663Term: Surgical hemostasisSystem Organ Class: 100000004865Therapeutic area: Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Surgical Procedures, Operative [E04]
EUCTR2015-000091-10-DKRigshospitalet, department of surgical Gastroenterology, C-Tx