DRKS00010029Not yet recruitingNot Applicable
Accuracy of optical vs. conventional impression methods in partially edentulous patients - COIM PEJ
niversitätsklinikum Freiburg; Department für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde; Klinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik0 sites30 target enrollmentStarted: February 17, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 30
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to one (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •Treatment at the Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Center for Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry
- •- Partially edentulous patients receiving a prosthetic reconstruction in the upper and/or lower jaw with a varying number of abutment teeth (= 2)
Exclusion Criteria
- •Infectious diseases, pregnancy, nonage, missing informed consent
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation and measurement time using a new integrated device consisting of the optical axial length measurement apparatus and a corneal topography with those using an existing measurement devices for cataract patientscataractJPRN-UMIN000015947Keio University School of Medicine100
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of visual performances with spectacles, contact lens and ortho k in myopiaCTRI/2021/07/034619Salai Dhavamathi J
Completed
Not Applicable
Accuracy of full arch digital impressions: an in-vitro and in-vivo comparisohealthy subjectDRKS00015459Align Technology1
Recruiting
Unknown
Identification of Errors by a new optical instrumentCTRI/2023/10/058767Alcon Laboratories India Pvt Ltd
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparing eye power measured by a person not trained in refraction versus the eye power measured by a person who is trained in refractionCTRI/2022/05/042464Aravind Eye Hospital