Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01021839
NCT01021839CompletedNot Applicable

Bovine Carotid Artery Graft Revisited: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Bovine Carotid Artery and Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene for Permanent Hemodialysis Access

Massachusetts General Hospital1 site in 1 country57 target enrollmentStarted: April 1, 2006Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
57
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Primary and Assisted Patency

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators did a randomized control trial comparing bovine carotid artery grafts with ePTFE grafts for patients that need hemodialysis access. The goal of the study was to determine differences in primary and assisted patency rates and frequency of complications between these two types of grafts. The investigators' hypothesis was that bovine carotid artery grafts more closely mimic autologous tissue and therefore, would provide better patency and fewer complications.

Detailed Description

Objective

To understand how bovine carotid artery (BCA) grafts compare to cuffed polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts as conduits for hemodialysis access in terms of patency and complications.

Background: Many hemodialysis patients do not have adequate anatomy for native arteriovenous fistulas. In these patients, synthetic conduits remain the only option for permanent hemodialysis access. We sought to compare the standard cuffed ePTFE with bovine carotid artery grafts as this has not been undertaken since the 1970's.

Methods: Following Institutional Review Board approval, a prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted enrolling 29 patients in the BCA group and 28 patients in the ePTFE group. Univariate and multivariate analysis was undertaken to understand factors that affect complications. Patency rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meyer method.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5, in need of hemodialysis access

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Surgically suitable for a native arteriovenous fistula

Arms & Interventions

Bovine Carotid Artery Graft

Active Comparator

Intervention: Grafts placement (Procedure)

Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts

Active Comparator

Intervention: Grafts placement (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Primary and Assisted Patency

Time Frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • patients were monitored for the following complications: thrombosis of the graft; graft infection; pseudoaneurysm formation; steal syndrome.(6,12,18 and 24 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials