Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Homeopathic Protocol in Patients With Non-metastatic Breast Cancer
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer FemaleJoint Pain
- Interventions
- Drug: Rhus toxicodendron 9 CH + Ruta graveolens 5 CH (Homeopathic Granules)Other: paracetamol (drug analgesic class1)
- Registration Number
- NCT04408560
- Lead Sponsor
- Institut Jean-Godinot
- Brief Summary
Interventional, randomised, prospective, monocentric study
- Detailed Description
Interventional, randomised, prospective, monocentric study
Primary objective :
Demonstrate the interest of the homeopathic Protocol to reduce the onset or aggravation of joint pain as a result of the taking of AI compared to conventional care
Secondary objective :
Compare between the two treatment groups:
* Evolution of joint pain
* Evolution of joint stiffness-rate of onset of pain and joint stiffness-delay in onset or aggravation of pain-evolution of the number of painful locations-evolution of the impact of pain on the quality of the sleep-consumption of permitted concomitant treatments (analgesics)
* Evolution of symptoms of hormonal deprivation-adherence to AI treatment
* Tolerance to AI
* Change seen by patients
* Stop rate and switch of AI-rate of recurrence of breast cancer
Describe in patients receiving homeopathic treatment:
* Adherence to homeopathic treatment
* Tolerance to homeopathic treatment
* Group A: Group of patients receiving conventional treatment (drug analgesic class 1) for joint pain + homeopathic treatment
* Group B: Group of patients receiving conventional treatment (drug analgesic class 1) for joint pain
Schedule :
* Inclusions start at: 01/09/2018
* End date of inclusions: 01/09/2021
* End date of follow-up: 23/03/2022
* Study report: 23/03/2023
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 140
- menopausal patient
- achieved histologically confirmed non-metastatic breast cancer with positive hormonal receptors
- starting an adjuvant anti-hormonal treatment with an AI
- patient benefiting from a social protection scheme
- patient mastering the French language -signature of free and informed consent -
- patient whose treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy is ongoing or anticipated during the theoretical period of the study or patient who has completed her chemotherapy treatment within a period of less than 4 weeks prior to the inclusion visit
- patient with proven inflammatory rheumatism already diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriatic rheumatism, ankylosing spondylitis -concomitant treatment with other complementary medicines (excepted Vitamin D), unless the treatment has been stable for at least 1 month.
- current treatment with narcotic drugs or corticosteroids
- patient with overexpressing breast cancer HER2
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Groupe A with homéopathic treatment paracetamol (drug analgesic class1) Conventional treatment : paracetamol (drug analgesic class1) + Homeopathic drug : Rhus toxicodendron 9 CH et Ruta graveolens 5 CH Groupe A with homéopathic treatment Rhus toxicodendron 9 CH + Ruta graveolens 5 CH (Homeopathic Granules) Conventional treatment : paracetamol (drug analgesic class1) + Homeopathic drug : Rhus toxicodendron 9 CH et Ruta graveolens 5 CH Groupe B without homeopathic treatment paracetamol (drug analgesic class1) Conventional treatment : paracetamol (drug analgesic class1)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evolution of the score of "most intense pain" during the first 3 months of treatment with AI 3 months Evaluation comparing between the 2 groups the area under the most intense pain curve, measured each week during the first 3 months of AI treatment using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) scale (1 no disconfort up to 10 complet disconfort)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evolution of joint pain 6 months variation of different pain scores on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) scale (1 no disconfort up to 10 complet disconfort) : pain severity score corresponding to the average of the 4 questions on pain intensity, and interference score corresponding to the average of the 7 questions on the impact of pain
Rate of onset of joint pain and stiffness 3 months For pain, among patients who answered "no" to the first question of Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (1 no disconfort up to 10 complet disconfort) to visit 1, percentage of patients who answered "Yes" to 3 months (visit 2)
Rate of onset of pain and joint stiffness 3 months Percentage of patients for whom pain and / or stiffness have occurred.
Time of onset or aggravation of pain 6 months time from which the "most severe pain" score has increased for at least 2 consecutive weeks since the Visit 1 score
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Philippe GUILBERT
🇫🇷Reims, France