Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01917565
NCT01917565
Unknown
Not Applicable

The Use of Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope and Fiberoptic Bronchoscope by Experienced Anesthesiologists

Marmara University1 site in 1 country90 target enrollmentAugust 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
the Hemodynamic Parameters
Sponsor
Marmara University
Enrollment
90
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The required time to successful tracheal intubation
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that when used by experienced anesthesiologists, Airtraq laryngoscope will increase the first-attempt success rate with shorter intubation times and more stable hemodynamic parameters.

Detailed Description

The special design of the Airtraq allows the direct exposure of the glottic opening without the necessity of optimal alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal axes. The results of the meta-analysis comparing the Airtraq with the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope concluded that the use of Airtraq results in a rapid and accurate intubation. The main advantages of the fiberoptic bronchoscope are minimal airway trauma and minimal deterioration of the hemodynamic parameters. The purpose of this study is to compare the hemodynamic parameters, intubation times, complications during and after intubation and postoperative sore throat scores of the patients having normal airway anatomy, intubated with Airtraq, Macintosh laryngoscope or fiberoptic bronchoscope, by experienced anesthesiologists.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2013
End Date
March 2014
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

tolga saracoglu

Assist. Prof. Dr.

Marmara University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA physical status classification of 1 or 2, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia and requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with ASA 3 or 4, Mallampati score of 3 or 4, history of difficult intubation, thyromental distance less than 6.5 cm, sternomental distance less than 12.5 cm, body mass index higher than 35 kg/m2 and limited neck mobility

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The required time to successful tracheal intubation

Time Frame: six months

The primary outcome variable is the required time to successful tracheal intubation

Secondary Outcomes

  • The first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation(six months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials