Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03667287
NCT03667287RecruitingNot Applicable

Full-thickness Skin vs. Synthetic Mesh in the Repair of Parastomal Hernia

Umeå University2 sites in 1 country90 target enrollmentStarted: January 23, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
90
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Rate of complications at 3 months

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized study to compare surgical methods for the repair of parastomal hernia.

Detailed Description

Parastomal hernia is a common complication to a stoma which can cause considerable suffering for the patient. The conventional methods of repair available today have disappointing results with high recurrence rates and serious complications. Some of the complications can be related to the introduction of foreign material into the abdominal wall. The investigators hypothesis is that the use of autologous full-thickness skin graft as reinforcement material can offer an alternative with fewer complications and recurrences.

Patients with symptomatic parastomal hernia will be included in a prospective randomized multicenter study comparing reinforcement with conventional synthetic mesh (with the best available technique today), to full thickness skin grafts placed in an intraperitoneal position. The intervention will be blinded to the participants, nursing staff and the follow-up staff. The participants will be followed up at 3, 12 and 36 months monitoring complications, recurrences, quality of life, strength of the abdomino-lumbar girdle and calculations will be done on the health economics.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Colo-, ileo- or urostomy
  • •Parastomal hernia diagnosed with intrastomal ultrasound and/or CT
  • •Symptoms from the parastomal hernia requiring surgical intervention
  • •Informed consent
  • •>18 years of age
  • •Sufficient knowledge in the Swedish language so that questionnaires can be answered

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Cognitive impairment unabling compliance to post-operative prescriptions and/or answering questionnaires
  • •Insufficient amount of good quality skin suitable for transplantation
  • •Expected high donor-site morbidity
  • •Fistula/e adjacent to stoma

Arms & Interventions

Full-thickness skin graft

Experimental

Repair of parastomal hernia with full-thickness skin graft, placed intraperitoneally, as reinforcement.

Intervention: Repair of parastomal hernia (Procedure)

Synthethic mesh

Active Comparator

Repair of parastomal hernia with best available conventional method, using synthetic mesh material as reinforcement

Intervention: Repair of parastomal hernia (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Rate of complications at 3 months

Time Frame: 3 month post-operative clinical follow-up

Complications will be assessed over a 3 year period of regular follow-up by an objective surgeon who is unaware of which surgical method which was used. Eventual complications may include infection, bleeding, seroma and fistula formation.

Secondary Outcomes

  • QoL - EORTC C30(3, 12 and 36 months.)
  • Abdominal strength(12 and 36 months.)
  • Recurrence(3, 12 and 36 months)
  • Pain - VHPQ(3, 12 and 36 months.)
  • QoL - EORTC CR29(3, 12 and 36 months.)
  • Health economics(12 and 36 months.)
  • Rate of complications at 12 months(12 month post-operative clinical follow-up)
  • Rate of complications at 36 months(36 month post-operative clinical follow-up)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials