Prognostication of Need for Rehabilitation and Special Support in ICU Survivors. Two Studies Prognosticating Adverse Physical or Psychological Outcome
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 573
- 试验地点
- 10
- 主要终点
- Adverse psychological outcome
研究概览
简要总结
Title: PROGnostication of need for REhabilitation and Special Support after Intensive Care Unit Stay - a multinational, observational study
Objectives:
- To investigate associations between potential risk factors (premorbid factors, in-ICU treatments/diagnoses and patient status at ICU discharge) and three-month physical and psychological outcome in ICU survivors.
- Based on the associations between identified risk factors and adverse outcomes, create and validate instruments, to be used at ICU discharge, predicting new-onset physical or psychological problems three months after ICU discharge.
Study design:
Prospective, observational multi centre (10 centres) cohort studies
Outcomes:
Adverse psychological outcome three months after ICU discharge (Posttraumatic Stress Syndrome-14 (PTSS-14) part B score >45 or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) subscale score >10). New-onset physical disability, defined as a reduction in Barthel Index ≥10 points compared with 2 weeks prior to hospital admission.
Study duration:
Recruitment of patients during 2-4 months in the ten study sites. Follow-up of primary endpoints 3 months after ICU discharge.
Number of subjects:
The aim is to screen all eligible patients and include 600-1000 ICU survivors during the recruitment period. The final number of included patients depends on case-mix in the units and potential exclusions.
Population:
Adult patients (18 years or older) discharged from ICU.
详细描述
Every year, an estimated 5 million patients are treated in European Intensive Care Units (ICUs) yearly, with 40 000 in Swedish ICUs alone (1,2). As many as 50 % of ICU survivors suffer from new-onset physical, psychological or cognitive problems in the months or even years after ICU discharge, irrespective of the reason for ICU admission (3-5). These problems are major hurdles for patients discharged from the ICU to return to life as it was prior to hospitalisation, but often remain unrecognised by healthcare providers (3-5). Follow-up led by ICU clinicians is increasingly recognised as an addendum to critical care (5,6). Yet, interventions in large and unselected groups of ICU survivors have failed to demonstrate meaningful improvements (7,8) except in vulnerable subgroups (9,10). Dilution of treatment effects is a recognised problem in interventional studies (11). Thus, identifying patients with risk for adverse outcome is an important enrichment step prior to evaluation of new interventions. The importance has recently been highlighted at a stakeholders meeting regarding post-ICU syndrome (12). Pilot studies from our research group indicate that risk prediction instruments for ICU survivors with fairly good accuracy can be developed and used in clinical practice (13,14) but predictors need to be assessed and validated in a larger sample.
Data collection All data will be entered in coded form to a web-based, electronic Case Report Form (Pheedit eCRF) supplied by the Central Steering Committee. The eCRF will be accessible with a username and password at all computers with internet access. All data can be entered in the eCRF. Each centre will keep a safely placed and locked patient ID and study code list, separate from the study data.
Potential risk factors:
Patient characteristics Age Sex Educational level** Working/school/parental leave/retired/unemployed/sick-leave** Physical comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index & SAPS III box 1) (supplement) History of psychological problems before ICU stay, including substance abuse) Caretaker of a child <18 years old** Barthel Index-100 prior to falling ill, reported by patient, and/or proxy together with medical chart review
In-ICU diagnoses/treatments/status Admission diagnosis (medical/surgical/trauma) Acute/elective hospital admission Admission severity of illness (APACHE II) Pelvic fracture Fractures (other than pelvic) ICU length of stay (hours) Severe sepsis/septic chock* Days with coma (for any reason) Days with invasive ventilator treatment Agitation/agitated delirium during ICU stay**
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •ICU stay>24 hours for postoperative patients and >12 hours for other ICU admissions
排除标准
- •Previously documented cognitive impairment (e.g. dementia or intellectual development disorder resulting in poor understanding/compliance in outcome assessment)
- •No home address
- •Unable to read and write in language spoken at local study site (Swedish/Danish/Dutch)/used in questionnaires
- •Patient declines participation
- •Moribund patient or with more than one limitation of therapy
- •Need for neurointensive care due to head trauma, intracranial hemorrhage or infarction AND GCS never better than 13 in the first 48 hours
- •Transfer to other ICU before discharge to ward
- •Solely in ICU for elective procedure (eg central line, epidural)
结局指标
主要结局
Adverse psychological outcome
时间窗: Three months post-ICU
Caseness defined as PTSS-14 part B score above 45 or HADS subscale score above 10
Adverse physical outcome
时间窗: Three months post-ICU
Caseness defined as Reduction in Barthel Index (0-100) by 10 points or more
次要结局
- Health-related quality of life assessed with Short Form -36 in patients(In first three months post-ICU)
研究者
Peter Sackey
Associate professor
Karolinska Institutet
