Evaluating the Impact of a Low-Cost Food Storage Cabinet ("Meatsafe") on Complementary Food Contamination and Diarrheal Disease in Low-Income Urban Households: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 290
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Prevalence of high-level E. coli contamination (>=100 colony-forming units per gram of food, cfu/g) in complementary food samples
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this clinical trial was to evaluate whether a simple household food storage cabinet called a "meatsafe" could reduce bacterial contamination of complementary foods and decrease diarrhea among children aged 6 to 24 months living in low-income settlements of Dhaka, Bangladesh.The study compared households that received a meatsafe and one-time food storage education with households that continued their usual practices. Participating caregivers completed surveys; provided stored food samples for microbiological testing; answered questions about recent child illness; and took part in spot checks of household hygiene and meatsafe use. The trial generated evidence on whether a low-cost and practical tool could help keep children's food safer and reduce diarrheal disease in settings without reliable refrigeration.
详细描述
Diarrhea remained a major cause of illness and death among children under five years old in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Bangladesh, complementary foods for young children were frequently contaminated with Escherichia coli (E. coli). Storing food uncovered exposed it to contamination from flies, dust, animals, and hands. Existing water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) programs did not directly address food hygiene within the home. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) tested whether a low-cost, mesh-covered food storage cabinet ("meatsafe") could reduce microbial contamination of cooked food in urban settlements in Dhaka. Meatsafes were commercially available in local markets and familiar to many households. A total of 290 households living in the Mirpur and Korail settlements were enrolled. Each household had at least one child aged 6 to 24 months. The protocol originally anticipated enrolling 252 households, but 290 were enrolled to maintain balanced allocation and mitigate attrition. Households were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Study staff completed follow-up visits every two weeks through Week 10 (five post-intervention follow-ups). Households in the control group did not receive a meatsafe or food hygiene education and continued their usual food storage practices. Households in the intervention group received a free meatsafe and one-time, in-person education on safe food storage and hygiene, along with an illustrated handout to display in the home. Participating households completed surveys on demographics, hygiene behaviors, child feeding, and health; provided stored food samples that were tested for E. coli using culture plating with colony-forming units per gram (CFU/g) enumeration; reported any child diarrhea in the previous seven days; and participated in spot checks of household hygiene and meatsafe use. The primary outcome was the prevalence of complementary food samples with >= 100 CFU/g of E. coli. Secondary outcomes included caregiver-reported diarrhea, dietary diversity, snack and street-food consumption, and measures of meatsafe use and functionality. This study produced evidence on whether providing meatsafes could improve food safety and reduce diarrheal disease among young children in dense urban communities.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
Not applicable. The intervention is visible (physical food storage cabinet called meatsafe), and masking is not possible.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 6 Months 至 24 Months(Child)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Household had at least one child aged 6 to 24 months.
- •Adult caregiver aged 18 years or older, responsible for child feeding, provided informed consent.
- •Household had lived in the study area for at least 6 months and expected to remain for at least 6 additional months.
- •Caregiver demonstrated willingness to comply with the assigned intervention or control.
排除标准
- •Household owned a functional meatsafe or refrigerator.
- •Household planned relocation outside the study area within 6 months.
- •Caregiver did not provide informed consent.
研究组 & 干预措施
Intervention Meatsafe Arm
Households received a low-cost, mesh-covered food storage cabinet ("meatsafe") and one-time, in-person education on safe food storage and hygiene. Caregivers also received an illustrated handout to display in the home.
干预措施: Meatsafe Food Storage Cabinet (Device)
Control Arm
Households did not receive a meatsafe or safe storage education and continued their usual food preparation and storage practices.
结局指标
主要结局
Prevalence of high-level E. coli contamination (>=100 colony-forming units per gram of food, cfu/g) in complementary food samples
时间窗: Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10
Food samples were collected from stored complementary foods and tested using standard culture plating. Colony counts were recorded as colony-forming units per gram (CFU/g). Samples with \>=100 CFU/g were classified as unsafe per international microbiological standards. Safety Issue: No
次要结局
- Temperature of food storage location(Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10)
- 7-day caregiver-reported diarrhea in children less than 23 months old(Baseline; Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10)
- Humidity of food storage location(Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10)
- Meatsafe screen condition(Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10)
- Duration of food storage(Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10)
- Meatsafe functionality(Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10.)
- Recall of food hygiene and meatsafe behavior-change messages(Week 10)
- Meatsafe Cleanliness(Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10)
