跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00652093
NCT00652093终止4 期

Lumbar Stenosis Outcomes Research II: Opana IR Versus Placebo and Active Control (Darvocet) for the Treatment of Walking Impairment in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized, Cross-Over Trial

University of Rochester1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 24 人开始时间: 2008年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
终止
入组人数
24
试验地点
1
主要终点
Time to First Symptoms (Tfirst) of Moderate Pain

研究概览

简要总结

The primary objective of the proposed pilot study is to determine the efficacy of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination in prolonging the time to onset of pain and reducing the severity of pain associated with walking in patients lumbar spinal stenosis that have clinical symptoms of neurogenic claudication. Neurogenic claudication is defined as movement induced leg pain, numbness, heaviness, or vague discomfort in part or all of one or both legs provoked with walking and standing and relieved by sitting, squatting, or forward flexion posturing. The secondary objective is to examine the functional benefit of oxymorphone hydrochloride and propoxyphene/acetaminophen combination with respect to improvement in duration and distance of walking.

详细描述

A computer-generated randomization plan was used for assignment of subjects to one of six treatment sequences (4 subjects per sequence): oxymorphone/propoxyphene/placebo, oxymorphone/placebo/propoxyphene, placebo/oxymorphone/propoxyphene, placebo/propoxyphene/oxymorphone, propoxyphene/oxymorphone/placebo, or propoxyphene/placebo/oxymorphone. One dose of blinded study drug (opana, propoxypehen, or placebo) was given at study days 1, 5, and 9. The primary endpoint was time to first symptoms of moderate intensity (NRS ≥ 4/10) during treadmill ambulation. Ambulation assessment was performed during the screening visit. Ambulation assessment was also performed 90 minutes after administration of study drug on days 1, 5 and 9, to evaluate pain intensity associated with walking as well as distance covered by the patients. Quantitative assessment of ambulation was conducted on a treadmill at 0° ramp incline at 1.2 miles per hour (mph). Measurement of self-reported symptom severity using the NRS at baseline, and every 30 seconds for a maximum of 15 minutes was recorded. The following information was also recorded: time to first symptoms, total ambulation time. The examination was stopped after 15 minutes or at the onset of severe symptoms. Severe symptoms were defined as the level of discomfort that would make patients stop walking in usual life situations. No one was encouraged or prompted to continue walking beyond this point. Patients were instructed to walk with an upright posture. They were not permitted to lean forward or hold onto the handrails during the examination. Secondary outcome measures included area under the curve of present pain intensity with ambulation at each specified time point, final pain intensity with walking, walking tolerance, time to return to baseline pain level after ambulation, as well as the results of a series of pain related questionnaires including: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient Global Assessment (PGA), NRS, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), modified Brief Pain Inventory short form (mBPI-sf), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Swiss Spinal Stenosis (SSS).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients must present with clinical symptoms of neurogenic claudication (exercise induced leg pain, numbness, heaviness, or vague discomfort in part or all of one or both legs provoked with walking and standing and relieved by sitting, squatting, or forward flexion posturing) and endorse limitation of walking tolerance due to these symptoms
  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain ≥ 6 in response to the following question: "Circle one number (from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain) - How would you rate the worst leg and lower back pain you experienced during walking last week?"
  • Patients must have confirmatory imaging by MRI or CT scan demonstrating at least one level of lumbar spinal stenosis within 1 year
  • Duration of symptoms > 3 months
  • Age > 50 years; male or female

排除标准

  • Past or present existence of a movement disorder, e.g., Parkinsonism, or an neurologic disease that might affect the ability to ambulate (e.g., signs/symptoms of cauda equina compression)
  • Cognitive impairment preventing full understanding or participation in the study
  • Peripheral vascular disease
  • Moderate to severe arthritis of the knee or hip that might severely compromise ambulation
  • Past or present lower extremity peripheral vascular disease
  • Serious concomitant medical illness (e.g., heart disease) that might impair ambulation assessment
  • Previous lumbar surgery for spinal stenosis (laminectomy with or without fusion) within the past 2 years or epidural steroid injection in the preceding 4 months.
  • Severe psychiatric disorder
  • Mean time to severe symptoms > 15 minutes.
  • Epidural steroid treatment within the last three months
  • History of drug or alcohol dependence
  • Serious intercurrent illness
  • Hypersensitivity to oxymorphone hydrochloride
  • Hypersensitivity to propoxyphene or acetaminophen
  • Severe bronchial asthma or hypercarbia, morphine analogs such as codeine, or any of the other ingredients of Opana
  • Suspicion of paralytic ileus
  • Moderate or severe hepatic impairment
  • Major conduction abnormality on ECG or cardiac (Bruce protocol) stress test within the past year.
  • Ongoing treatment with a long-acting opioid or regularly-scheduled use of a short acting opioid (>3 doses/day on four or more days/week).

研究组 & 干预措施

Opana then darvocet then placebo

Experimental

Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.

干预措施: opana then darvocet then placebo (Drug)

Opana then placebo then darvocet

Experimental

Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.

干预措施: opana then placebo then darvocet (Drug)

Placebo then opana then darvocet

Experimental

Placebo tablet tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) was given one time at the third study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.

干预措施: placebo then opana then darvocet (Drug)

Placebo then darvocet then opana

Experimental

Placebo tablet tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.

干预措施: Placebo then darvocet then opana (Drug)

Darvocet then opana then placebo

Experimental

Darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.

干预措施: Darvocet then opana then placebo (Drug)

Darvocet then placebo then opana

Experimental

Darvocet (100mg Propoxyphene/650mg Acetaminophen) tablet was given one time at the second study visit, four days later placebo tablet was given one time at the third study visit, four days later Opana IR, 5mg (oxymorphone hydrochloride) tablet was given one time at the fourth study visit.

干预措施: Darvocet then placebo then opana (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Time to First Symptoms (Tfirst) of Moderate Pain

时间窗: study visit

Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable)the time to first symptoms (Tfirst) with a NRS score greater than or equal to 4 (moderate pain level), with treadmill ambulation was measured. Patients were excluded from the trial if there pain at rest was greater than or equal to 4/10.

次要结局

  • Recovery Time(study visit)
  • Patient Global Assessment (PGA)(study visit)
  • Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score(study visit)
  • Final Pain(study visit)
  • Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)(study visit)
  • Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score- Symptom Severity(study visit)
  • Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score- Physical Function(study visit)
  • Total Distance(study visit)
  • Area Under the Curve(study visit)
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS)(study visit)
  • Modified Brief Pain Inventory (mBPI)- Interference Score(study visit)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

John Markman

Director, Translational Pain Research

University of Rochester

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验