MedPath

Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department: CTN 0069

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Opioid Use Disorder
Interventions
Other: Standard Dissemination Practice
Other: Implementation Facilitation (IF)
Registration Number
NCT03023930
Lead Sponsor
Yale University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of (1) Implementation Facilitation (IF) on rates of provision of Emergency Department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) treatment with referral for ongoing medication-assisted treatment (MAT) and the (2) effectiveness of IF on patient engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days.

Detailed Description

The study was originally proposed to use a Hybrid Type 3 Effectiveness-Implementation framework and a modified stepped wedge design.

Original protocol registration language: The study will be conducted at four EDs with a high prevalence of patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD). The four sites will receive the same sequence of evaluations and interventions: the baseline evaluation period after the standard dissemination practice, the IF phase, and continuation of facilitation into the IF evaluation period. The timing of initiation of the study activities at each site will be randomly offset by \~ 3 month increments to accommodate logistical constraints of simultaneous implementation at all sites. The study populations will include (1) ED providers and staff involved in the treatment of patients with OUD; (2) Community opioid treatment provider and program staff involved in providing care for patients with OUD referred from the ED; and (3) ED patients with moderate to severe OUD.

Exploratory analyses have been added to assess the impact of COVID-19 and social distancing guidance on drug use and drug supply; access to medications for opioid use disorder; and COVID19 disease from the perspectives of patient participants and ED leadership.

Upon results entry, changes were made to reflect that the study design originally was described as a "modified step wedge" but ultimately was not designed or implemented as such, as there was no substantial overlap of the baseline evaluation and IF evaluation periods. Thus, the statistical plan was adjusted accordingly.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1731
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients who are treated in the ED during study screening hours with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5 criteria for moderate to severe OUD and provide an opioid positive urine sample will be eligible to participate.

Patient

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who test positive for fentanyl only are not eligible due to lack of uniformly available rapid urine tests.
  • Patients will be excluded if they have a medical or psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization at the index ED visit, are acutely suicidal or severely cognitively impaired precluding informed consent, present from an extended care facility, require continued prescription opioids for a pain condition, are a prisoner or in police custody at time of index ED visit, are currently (past 30 days) enrolled in formal addiction treatment including by court order, are unable to provide 2 contact numbers, are unwilling to follow study procedures, have been previously enrolled in the current study or do not speak English.

ED and Community Participants Inclusion Criteria:

  • ED and community providers and administrators (i.e. physicians, residents, fellows, nursing, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, social workers, counselors, administrative directors, office-based physicians and opioid treatment program representatives) as well as ED patients with OUD.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Evidenced-based Practice DisseminationImplementation Facilitation (IF)Evaluating standard dissemination practice compared with implementation facilitation
Evidenced-based Practice DisseminationStandard Dissemination PracticeEvaluating standard dissemination practice compared with implementation facilitation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implementation (Considered the Primary Outcome)12 months

The primary implementation outcome will be evaluated assessing the rate of ED-initiated BUP therapy with referral for ongoing MAT

Effectiveness30 Days Post Enrollment

The primary effectiveness outcome is defined as the rates of patient engagement in formal addiction treatment on the 30th day post enrollment.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implementation: ED Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) ScorePre IF (Baseline)

ED ORCA score relating to ED-initiated BUP with referral for ongoing MAT. Scores are dichotomized as less ready (scores 0-6) or most ready (scores 7-10).

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

Harborview Medical Center

🇺🇸

Seattle, Washington, United States

Weill Cornell Medical College

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

University of Cincinnati Medical Center

🇺🇸

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

The Mount Sinai Hospital

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

Johns Hopkins Hospital

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath