Robotic Athermal Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
- Conditions
- Stage I Prostate CancerStage IIA Prostate Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeryOther: laboratory biomarker analysisOther: quality-of-life assessmentOther: questionnaire administration
- Registration Number
- NCT02079155
- Lead Sponsor
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial compares a recently developed technique, called robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy (R-LESS RP), to the current standard of robotic technique for prostate cancer, robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in treating patients with newly diagnosed, locally confined prostate cancer. Both procedures are types of robotic radical prostatectomy, or the robot-assisted removal of the prostate though a small incision in the belly. In the standard approach, 4-5 small (1-2 cm) incisions are made in the lower abdomen to allow the insertion of robotic instruments. In the R-LESS technique, all instruments are inserted through a single incision. R-LESS RP is less invasive than RALP and may leave a smaller scar and cause less pain.
- Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate pain and analgesic requirement of R-LESS RP compared to standard RALP.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Time to oral intake. II. Time to resume ambulation. III. Hospital stay, counted in whole days from the day of surgery to the day of discharge.
IV. Perioperative parameters, including: operative time (defined as time elapsed from skin incision to placement of the final skin suture); estimated blood loss; additional ports; conversion to standard RALP (in R-LESS RP patients), or laparoscopic, or open surgery; length of stay.
V. Intraoperative complications. VI. Postoperative complications, recorded according to the Clavien classification.
VII. Body image perception, measured using the body image questionnaire (BIQ). VIII. Scar evaluation (at suture removal and at 6 month) by using a validated assessment tool, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
IX. Health related quality of life, measured as patients' perception of functioning, disability, and well-being related to the following eight concepts: physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitation caused by emotional problems, and mental health.
X. Urinary continence, assessing the number of pads used daily. XI. Erectile Function, assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo standard RALP.
ARM II: Patients undergo R-LESS RP.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 1 year.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- Patients must have a biopsy proven newly diagnosed locally confined, stage T1a, T2a or T2b prostate cancer
- Judged by the study doctor to be a suitable candidate for a radical prostatectomy
- Serum prostate specific antigen equal to or less than 10 ng/mL
- Gleason score equal to or less than 7
- Life expectancy greater than 10 years
- Prostate size on trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) measurement less than 50 grams
- Favorable operative risk defined as American Society of Anesthesiology Score (ASA score) =< 3
- Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document or have a surrogate with the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent
- Patients with any prior pelvic surgery
- Patients with prior history of pelvic fractures or hip replacement
- Large pelvic or intra-abdominal masses
- Any condition or history of illness or surgery that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient (e.g. significant cardiovascular conditions)
- Poor surgical risk (defined as American Society of Anesthesiology Score > 3)
- Active infection
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
- Body mass index equal to or greater than 35
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm II (R-LESS RP) questionnaire administration Patients undergo R-LESS RP. Arm I (RALP) laboratory biomarker analysis Patients undergo standard RALP. Arm I (RALP) questionnaire administration Patients undergo standard RALP. Arm I (RALP) quality-of-life assessment Patients undergo standard RALP. Arm II (R-LESS RP) laboratory biomarker analysis Patients undergo R-LESS RP. Arm I (RALP) robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery Patients undergo standard RALP. Arm II (R-LESS RP) robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery Patients undergo R-LESS RP. Arm II (R-LESS RP) quality-of-life assessment Patients undergo R-LESS RP.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean pain score, evaluated with the visual analog pain score (VAPS) Up to 1 year Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Mean analgesic consumption, obtained from medical charts and reported as units of parenteral morphine equivalents (mg) Up to 1 month Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to oral intake Up to 1 year Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Time to resume ambulation Up to 1 year Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Length of hospital stay, counted in whole days from the day of surgery to the day of discharge Up to 3 days Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Operative time, defined as time elapsed from skin incision to placement of the final skin suture Day 1 Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Estimated blood loss during surgery Day 1 Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Additional ports during surgery Day 1 Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Incidence of conversion to standard RALP, laparoscopic, or open surgery in R-LESS RP patients Day 1 Compared by means of Fisher's exact test.
Incidence of intraoperative complications Day 1 Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Incidence of postoperative complications, recorded according to the Clavien classification Up to 1 year Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.
Body image perception, measured using the BIQ Up to 1 year Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. The BIQ consists of two scales: the body image scale, which assesses attitudes to bodily appearance and consists of five questions (score 5-20), and the cosmetic scale which assesses degree of satisfaction with the appearance of the scare and consists of three questions (score 3-24).
Scar evaluation, assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Up to 1 year Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Assessed at suture removal and at 6 months. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale consists of two scales: the observer scale and the patient scale. Both scales contain 6 items that are scored numerically. Each of the six items on both scales has a 10-step score, with 10 indicating the worst imaginable scar or sensation. The total score of both scales consists of adding the scores of each of the six items (range, 6 to 60). The lowest score, 6, reflects normal skin, whereas the highest score, 60, reflects the worst imaginable scar.
Health related quality of life, measured as patients' perception of functioning, disability, and well-being Up to 1 year Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Patients' perception of functioning, disability, and well-being will be measured related to the following eight concepts: physical functioning, role limitations cause by physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitation caused by emotional problems, and mental health.
Urinary continence, assessed by the number of pads used daily Up to 12 months Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure.
Erectile function, assessed by the IIEF-5 Up to 12 months Compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Evaluated once in preoperative period and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure.