Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00474123
NCT00474123
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Antiplatelet and Anti-inflammatory Effects of High Dose Statin Monotherapy Versus Moderate Dose Statin Plus Ezetimibe

University of Sao Paulo1 site in 1 country78 target enrollmentJanuary 2006

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Simvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks
Conditions
Stable Angina
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Enrollment
78
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
C-reactive Protein
Status
Completed
Last Updated
15 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Among patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), it is not clear if the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol reduction differ between high-dose simvastatin alone and combined ezetimibe/simvastatin.

The investigators sought to compare the anti-inflammatory and anti-platelet effects of ezetimibe 10 mg / simvastatin 20 mg (E10/S20) to simvastatin 80 mg (S80).

Detailed Description

Introduction Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), a robust evidence base supports the beneficial effects of statin therapy on mortality and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes . Recently, two large trials , have demonstrated that compared to standard dose statin therapy, high statin doses reduced Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) to extremely low levels and decreased coronary events, even in patients with normal levels of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C). Subsequently, recent guidelines have suggested an Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) treatment goal of \<70 mg/dL in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Achieving such low Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) levels frequently demands an intensive Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) reduction, often above 50%. Ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, can be used as an additional therapy if statin monotherapy fails to reduce Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) below the treatment goal. Furthermore, anti-inflammatory and antithrombotic pleiotropic effects of statins might explain, at least in part, the large benefits demonstrated in randomized trials , . For example, in hypercholesterolemic patients treated with statins, a decrease in inflammation-associated markers such as the C-reactive protein (CRP) has been described , although it is debated whether this effect is clearly independent of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C). Moreover, although inhibition of platelets by statin therapy is a well established effect , , it has not yet been clarified whether platelet inhibition by statin therapy depends on the reduction of Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) or on the inhibition of intracellular signal pathways accompanied by disaggregating effects. Two alternative pharmacologic strategies are equally effective in reducing Low-density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C): high-dose statin alone and combined treatment with ezetimibe plus moderate-dose statin . It is not known whether these two strategies have different cholesterol-independent pleiotropic effects on inflammation and platelets. We therefore compared the anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet effects of two intensive pharmacologic strategies to reduce cholesterol: 80 mg of simvastatin (S80) versus 10 mg ezetimibe/ 20 mg of simvastatin (E10/S20). Anti-inflammatory effects were assessed by performing serial measurements of the following biomarkers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, oxidized Low-density lipoprotein-C (oxLDL), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM)-1. Platelet aggregation was also compared between the two strategies.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2006
End Date
August 2009
Last Updated
15 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Stable angina
  • Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 70-160 mg/dl

Exclusion Criteria

  • Renal failure
  • Simvastatin current treatment\>20mg
  • Hepatic disease
  • Inflammatory diseases

Arms & Interventions

Simvastatin 80 mg

Patients were treated with simvastatin 80 mg for 6 weeks

Intervention: Simvastatin 80 mg/day for 6 weeks

Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg

Patients were treated with daily Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks

Intervention: Ezetimibe 10 mg / Simvastatin 20 mg

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

C-reactive Protein

Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Serum was separated by centrifugation from the blood samples. For high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein measurement, whole venous blood was collected in tubes without anticoagulant and centrifuged at room temperature. Serum C-Reactive Protein was assessed with a high-sensitivity, latex microparticle-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay (Behring Nephelometer Analyzer System; Behring Diagnostics, Somerville, NJ).

Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting oxLDL (Mercodia, USA) were applied.

Platelet Function Analyzer [PFA]-100

Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Samples were collected in 3.8% sodium citrate (buffered, pH 5.5, Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, UK) for platelet function tests. Platelet function assays were processed within 2 hours of blood collection. The PFA-100 records the closure time (CT), witch means the time in seconds (s) from the start of the test until the platelet plug occludes the aperture.

Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1

Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

Serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R\&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK).

Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (sICAM)-1

Time Frame: Change from baseline at 6 weeks

serum samples were stored at -70°C and were determined simultaneously by ELISA in order to avoid variation of assay conditions. Commercial ELISA assays detecting MCP-1/ICAM-1 (R\&D Systems, Europe, Abingdon, UK)

Soluble CD40 Ligand

Time Frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.

A commercial ELISA assay detecting sCD40L (R\&D Systems, USA) was applied. Detection limits and intra-assay variability was respectively, as follows: sCD-40L 15.6 pg/mL (intra-assay variability not available).

Interleukin-6

Time Frame: Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and after at the conclusions of the six weeks study period.

A commercial ELISA assay detecting IL-6 (Siemens, USA) was applied.

Secondary Outcomes

  • LDL Cholesterol(Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.)
  • Triglyceride(Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.)
  • Endothelial Progenitor Cells(Fasting venous blood samples were drawn immediately after randomization and at the conclusions of the six week study period.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials