跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05657067
NCT05657067招募中不适用

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Structured Emotionally Focused Family Therapy: A Pilot Study

VU University of Amsterdam2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 15 人开始时间: 2022年7月26日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
15
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change from the waiting period in Accessibility and responsiveness of the attachment figures on the Accessibility, Responsiveness, Emotional Engagement questionnaire (ARE; Johnson, 2008).

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this clinical pilot study is to assess effectiveness and feasilibity of structured Emotionally Focused Family Therapy (EFFT) for parents and adolescents.

Participants will fill out questionnaires before, during and after the EFFT treatment Finally, feasibility will be assessed by semi-structured interviews.

详细描述

Background

The prevalence of mental health problems of children and adolescents worldwide is substantial with 10-20%. Attachment related emotion regulation is considered an important transdiagnostic process underlying mental health problems in adolescents. Emotionally Focused Family Therapy (EFFT) aims at the development of secure attachment between parents and their children in order to reduce the child's vulnerability for mental health problems and enhance resilience.

Intervention

The current pilot study is a first test of the newly developed protocol of structured EFFT. It consists of 4 phases and 16-21 sessions: phase 1 (1-2 sessions with the whole family) reframing the individual adolescent's problem as related to insecure attachment relations with the parents; phase 2A (4-6 sessions with the parents) and phase 2B (3 sessions with the adolescent) are delivered in parallel fashion and aim to prepare them to phase 3 by exploring insecure attachment relations and unfulfilled attachment needs; phase 3 (3 sessions with parents and adolescent) is focused on development of secure attachment relations between parents and adolescent; phase 4 (3 sessions with the whole family) consolidation of secure attachment and additional interventions for residual psychopathology; and finally a booster session with the whole family. Treatment adherence will be assessed with a check list by independent raters of sound recordings of random sessions.

Design and method

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
12 Years 至 18 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Change from the waiting period in Accessibility and responsiveness of the attachment figures on the Accessibility, Responsiveness, Emotional Engagement questionnaire (ARE; Johnson, 2008).

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)

The ARE is a validated self-reported 6 item questionnaire assessing accessibility and responsiveness of the attachment figures over the past month. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period.

Change from the waiting period in Negative interaction patterns on the Relationship Dynamics Scale (RDS; Stanley et al., 2001) during and after EFFT.

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)

The RDS is a validated self-reported 4 item questionnaire assessing negative interaction patterns over the past 2 weeks. Possible total scores range from 4 (negligible) to 16 (often). Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period.

Change from the waiting period in Relationship satisfaction between the parents as partners on the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI; Funk & Rogge, 2007).

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)

The CSI is a validated self-reported 4 item questionnaire assessing relationship satisfaction over the past week. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period.

Change from the waiting period in Discipline on the Discipline subscale of the Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index Toddler Scale (SEPTI; Coleman & Karraker, 2003).

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)

The Discipline 7 item subscale is part of the SEPTI a validated self-reported questionnaire assessing displine of the children by their partners over the past month. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period.

Change from the waiting period in Attachment between parents and adolescent and the parents as partners on the Experiences in Close Relationships - Relationship Structures questionnaire (ECR-RS; Fraley et al., 2011)

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)

The ECR is a validated self-reported 9 item questionnaire assessing Anxiety about rejection and abandonment and Avoidance of intimacy. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period.

Change from the waiting period in the adolescent's Complaints on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 1997).

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)

The SDQ is a validated self-reported 20 item questionnaire assessing adolescent's Complaints over the past month. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period.

次要结局

  • Feasibility of structured EFFT.(Two months after the final session, after the booster session has taken place. Semi-structured interviews will take place with the adolescent being interviewed separately from his or her parents.)

研究者

发起方
VU University of Amsterdam
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Henk Jan Conradi

PhD, Assistant Professor

University of Amsterdam

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Structured EFFT | 临床试验