Translational Research in Pelvic Pain. Deep Phenotyping of Women With Endometriosis-associated Pain and Bladder Pain Syndrome
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Endometriosis
- Sponsor
- University of Oxford
- Enrollment
- 787
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study aims to better understand the pathways leading to pain in women with two types of pelvic pain condition (endometriosis-associated pain and bladder pain syndrome) and determine whether these pathways can be used to subgroup patients.
Detailed Description
Chronic pelvic pain is as common as asthma, migraine and back pain and has a very significant impact on quality of life. However, it is still poorly understood and the available treatments are limited and often not successful. This project focuses on two causes of chronic pelvic pain: endometriosis and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Endometriosis (the presence of tissue resembling the lining of the womb outside of the womb) is very common, affecting \~1 in 10 women, and is associated with often disabling pelvic pain symptoms including painful periods, pain throughout the month, and pain associated with sex, passing urine and opening bowels. Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome is much less common but dramatically reduces quality of life with many women planning their day around trips to the toilet. This multi-centre study will be carried out at 3 sites in Europe and 1 in the U.S.. Rather than focusing on the pelvis, the investigators will approach these conditions in the context of other chronic pain conditions with which they share many features and thus consider the many different systems that might contribute to generating and maintaining pain. The investigators will combine detailed clinical and questionnaire data with tests of the function of a variety of systems (including nerve function, stress response and psychology) and the results of analyses of different body fluids and tissues (including blood, urine, endometriosis lesions). No study treatment or intervention will be given during TRiPP. The aim is to identify pathways responsible for pain in these women and determine whether they can be divided into subgroups on the basis of different pain pathways that might therefore respond to different treatments. Ultimately the investigators hope to identify new targets for treatment and contribute to the design of more personalised treatment plans.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Female, aged 18 - 50 years.
- •Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- •EAP/EABP/CON: previously enrolled in EndOX or BCE cohorts with consent to be contacted again.
- •EAP: Surgical diagnosis of endometriosis; at least one pelvic pain \>3/
- •EABP: Surgical diagnosis of endometriosis; at least one pelvic pain \>3/10; pain perceived by the patient as arising from the bladder AND from other area(s) of the pelvis; at least one urinary symptom (e.g. urge, frequency).
- •BPS: fulfil ESSIC criteria (Pelvic pain, pressure or discomfort for greater than 6 months, perceived to be related to the urinary bladder accompanied by at least one other urinary symptom like persistent urge to void or frequency).
Exclusion Criteria
- •Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.
- •Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.
- •EAP: pain perceived by the patient as arising from the bladder; urinary symptoms (e.g. urge, frequency).
- •CON: previous diagnosis of endometriosis; pelvic pain or dysmenorrhoea (NRS\>3/10)
- •BPS: previous diagnosis of endometriosis.
- •Additionally, for physiological testing:
- •Participants who have participated in another research trial involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks.
- •And for fMRI:
- •fMRI compatible.
- •Contraindication to fMRI scan i.e. metallic implants, stents, clips, weight greater than acceptable for local fMRI scanner etc.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)
Time Frame: 1 year
QST of the dorsal of the foot and midline lower abdomen according to the German Neuropathic Pain Network Protocol.
Presence of abdominal wall muscle tenderness
Time Frame: 1 year
Assessment of the abdominal wall specifically looking for muscle tenderness according to a standardised protocol (an enhanced Carnetts test as described by Scheltinga and Roumen 2017). Subjects will be categorised into muscle tenderness present or absent.
Change of pressure pain threshold (PPT)
Time Frame: 1 year
A standardised conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm will be used to investigate the change in pressure pain threshold on the dorsum of the foot. An ischaemic stimulus to the contralateral arm will be used as the conditioned stimulus. The foot PPT will be measured before the conditioned stimulus and immediately after. The change will be reported as the (PPTbefore - PPTafter).
Area under the curve (AUC) of single day salivary cortisol profile
Time Frame: 1 year
Saliva will be collected at home at the specified times allowing a daily AUC of salivary cortisol for each subject to be calculated. Collection times: waking; 30-45 minutes after waking; before lunch; before dinner; bedtime.
Change in salivary cortisol
Time Frame: Saliva collected immediately before and immediately after CPM paradigm (outcome 3).
A saliva sample will be collected at rest immediately before the CPM paradigm described in outcome 3 and then again immediately after. The ischaemic pain stimulus used as the conditioning stimulus in this paradigm is the most noxious component of the physiological testing paradigms used in this study and therefore the most likely to generate a stress response. The change will be reported as Cortisol(before)-Cortisol(after).
Change in heart rate
Time Frame: HR assessed immediately before and immediately after the CPM paradigm (outcome 3)
Assessed at rest immediately before the CPM paradigm described in outcome 3 and then again immediately after. The ischaemic pain stimulus used as the conditioning stimulus in this paradigm is the most noxious component of the physiological testing paradigms used in this study and therefore the most likely to generate a stress response. The change will be reported as HR(before) - HR(after).
Heart rate (HR)
Time Frame: 1 year
Assessed over a 20 minute period at rest.
Blood pressure (BP)
Time Frame: 1 year
Assessed over a 20 minute period at rest. Measured in mmHG.
Volume voided at maximum tolerance
Time Frame: 1 year
Assessed with standardised non-invasive bladder filling paradigm described in outcome 10. The volume of urine voided when maximum tolerance is reached will be measured in mls.
fMRI scan
Time Frame: 1 year
fMRI scan with response to punctate stimuli of midline lower abdomen.
Pain Catastrophising: Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS) (Sullivan)
Time Frame: Baseline
Measured with the Pain Catastrophising Scale (Sullivan). Scores range from 0 - 52 with high scores representing higher levels of pain catastrophising. Although three sub scales exist they will not be assessed for the purposes of these main analyses.
Comorbid psychological distress
Time Frame: Baseline
Measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Scores range from 0 - 21 for each of the two sub scales measuring anxiety and depression. The two sub scales will be summed as a unidimensional measure of psychological distress in initial analyses (0 - 42 with higher scores representing greater distress).
Change in Blood pressure
Time Frame: BP assessed immediately before and immediately after the CPM paradigm (outcome 3)
Assessed at rest immediately before the CPM paradigm described in outcome 3 and then again immediately after. The ischaemic pain stimulus used as the conditioning stimulus in this paradigm is the most noxious component of the physiological testing paradigms used in this study and therefore the most likely to generate a stress response. The change will be reported as BP(before) - BP(after).
Bladder sensitivity to filling
Time Frame: 1 year
Assessed with standardised non-invasive bladder filling paradigm, measured as time to verbal reports of different sensations of bladder fullness (first sensation, first urge) and then need to void (maximum tolerance) after drinking 600 ml water. Subjects will be categorised into those with bladder sensitivity compared to published norms for reproductive age women and those with normal bladder sensation.
Secondary Outcomes
- Transcriptomic data(Baseline)
- Past trauma(Baseline)
- Metabolomic data(Baseline)
- Proteomic data(Baseline)
- Comorbidities(Baseline)
- Recent trauma(Baseline)