Evaluation of Groin Lymphadenectomy Extent For Metastatic Melanoma

Phase 3

Active, not recruiting

• Conditions: Metastatic Melanoma to the Groin Lymph Nodes
• Interventions: Procedure: Inguinal Lymphadenectomy; Procedure: Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy

• Registration Number: NCT02166788
• Lead Sponsor: Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials Limited

Brief Summary

BACKGROUND: Spread of metastatic melanoma to the groin lymph nodes (LN) is a common event affecting about 350 people a year in Australia. Globally it has been shown that patients with involved groin LN, without proven pelvic LN disease on imaging receive 1 of 3 management strategies in equal proportions - inguinal lymphadenectomy (IL); ilio-inguinal lymphadenectomy (I-IL); or variable use of either depending on circumstances. Different experts have strong and polarised opinions favouring either IL or more extensive I-IL with existing cases series reporting conflicting data on best cancer outcomes. No high level evidence proves which operation is best. HYPOTHESIS: There will be no significant difference in DFS between patients having IL or I-IL, conditional on PET/CT scan showing no evidence of pelvic disease at the time of diagnosis of groin LN metastatic melanoma. AIMS: To provide a rational evidence base for management for melanoma to the groin LNs by randomly assessing the effect of each operation on DFS, distant DFS, overall survival (OS), morbidity - including early complications and longer-term rates of lymphedema as well as comprehensively assessed QOL. Also to clarify the reliability of PET/CT scans for staging pelvic LNs and evaluate any health economic benefits of I-IL over IL. TARGET POPULATION: To recruit 634 patients in 5 years. DESIGN: An Australian led, international, multi-centre, non-inferiority, phase III, prospective, randomised clinical trial comparing IL or I-IL for patients with metastatic melanoma to groin LNs and no evidence of pelvic disease on PET/CT. ENDPOINTS: DFS, Distant DFS, OS and QOL at 5 years. Accuracy of PET/CT for pelvic LN metastases.

OUTCOMES: International standardization of care, improved cancer outcomes, improved QOL for patients with groin metastatic melanoma. Proof of principle about extent of surgery when PET/CT is clear in adjacent LN areas, leading to clinical trials investigating management of other lymph node fields.

Detailed Description

Background and Rationale

Spread of metastatic melanoma to the groin lymph nodes (LN) is a common event for patients with melanoma. In melanoma treatment centres around the world, patients without demonstrated pelvic LN disease receive 1 of 3 strategies of management in relatively equal proportions (Pasquali, Spillane et al. 2012):

i. Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (IL) ii. Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy (I-IL) iii. Variable use of either IL or I-IL surgery.

Some larger melanoma centres have an institutional policy that all patients have either IL or I-IL for metastatic inguinal node involvement. Nearly all centres would agree that patients with pelvic LN involvement without distant metastatic disease should have I-IL.

Study Objectives This study aims to provide a more rational evidence base for appropriate management for metastatic melanoma in the groin LNs, through assessing the effect of the addition of ipsilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy on patient disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), morbidity, and quality of life. In addition, the study will clarify the reliability of PET (Positron Emission Tomography) / CT (Computed Tomography) scans for staging pelvic LNs, clarify morbidity differences between the operations in a balanced cohort, evaluate any health economic benefits of I-IL over IL and provide a tissue and serum resource to be used to identify biological markers of recurrence and progression after inguinal metastases.

Study Hypothesis There will be no significant difference in DFS between patients having IL or I-IL, conditional on PET/CT scan showing no evidence of pelvic disease at the time of diagnosis of groin LN metastatic melanoma.

Study Population The aim is to recruit 634 patients in 5 years who are 15 years or older with cytologically or histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma in inguinal LNs (H\&E \& IHC); specifically with no evidence of pelvic node involvement or distant spread of melanoma clinically or on PET/CT staging scans. To be eligible patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0-2 at randomisation.

Study Treatments Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 to undergo an IL or I-IL.

Study Design This is an international, multi-centre, phase III, non-inferiority, prospective, randomised clinical trial.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2014-06-15
• Study First Submitted QC: 2014-06-15
• Study First Posted: 2014-06-18
• Study Start: 2015-01
• Primary Completion: 2019-10-16
• Status Verified: 2022-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2022-04-06
• Last Update Posted: 2022-04-07
• Study Completion: 2030-08

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 634

Inclusion Criteria

Patients may be included in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria:

1. Must be 15 and above.

2. Have primary cutaneous melanoma or if the patient presents with stage III melanoma with no known primary tumour then a thorough search for the primary should be documented (including perineal and perianal areas)

3. Life expectancy of at least 10 years from the time of diagnosis, not considering the melanoma in question, as determined by the PI

4. Must have one or multiple inguinal node(s) involved, histologically or cytologically proven as metastatic melanoma. This can can be detected:

   • At the time of diagnosis;
   • Or by Ultrasound detection;
   • Or later after relapse when no Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) was performed at the time of primary tumour management;
   • Or as a result of SNB;
   • Or at the time of regional recurrence after "false negative" SNB;

5. Absent distant disease clinically and on PET/CT scan. (Patients must have NO further distant disease or visceral metastases)

6. ECOG performance status must be between 0 to 2 at randomisation

7. Whole body PET/CT scan, specifically stating there is NO evidence of pelvic lymph node involvement prior to randomisation and a CT Brain or MRI Brain scan. Scans must be performed within 6 weeks prior to randomisation.

8. Able to provide written, informed consent

9. Willing to return to the centre for follow up examinations and procedures, as outlined in the protocol.

10. All patients must be randomised and undergo lymphadenectomy surgery no more than 120 days following diagnosis of inguinal LN involvement

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

1. Distant metastatic disease on clinical examination or staging imaging (CT/MRI brain or whole body PET/CT scan). Scans must be performed within 6 weeks prior to randomisation

2. Pelvic LN involvement on SNB or PET/CT scan suggestive of metastatic disease in the pelvis - criteria for diagnosis include normal size or enlarged lymph nodes (> 1 cm) with increased FDG activity on PET (SUV >3). If there are enlarged, necrotic lymph nodes FDG activity on PET is not required to be present. If unsure central review should be sought.

3. Bilateral inguinal lymph node involvement

4. Patients with a history of major pelvic surgery and / or regional radiotherapy at any time in the past

5. Requiring planned radiotherapy following surgery due to macroscopic, bulky and matted nodes.

6. Unfit for General Anaesthesia

7. Melanoma-related operative procedures not corresponding to criteria described in the protocol

8. Patients with prior cancers, except:

   • those with a thin <=1 mm, regionally unrelated melanoma > 5 years ago
   • those with a good prognosis regionally unrelated cancer (>90% probability of 10 years disease specific survival)
   • other cancers diagnosed more than five years ago with no evidence of disease recurrence within this time
   • successfully treated basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma
   • carcinoma in-situ of the cervix
   • 1 episode of in transit melanoma > 3 years ago

9. A medical or psychiatric condition that compromises ability to give informed consent or complete the protocol

10. Positive urine pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential (+/-7 days of randomisation onto the trial)

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Arm 1: Inguinal Lymphadenectomy	Inguinal Lymphadenectomy	Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (IL) is removal of the easily accessible superficial groin lymph nodes (LNs) and has a median LN retrieval of 11 lymph nodes
Arm 2: Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy	Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy	Ilio-inguinal Lymphadenectomy (I-IL) is the removal of the same superficial groin lymp nodes (LN) removed during an IL but also combined with the more surgically complex removal of the ipsilateral pelvic LN. About twice as many LN are removed with I-IL compared to IL.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The primary endpoint of the study will be Disease Free Survival following lymphadenectomy, assessed after 60 months of follow-up.	60 Months	The difference between IL and I-IL surgery in DFS 5 years after randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Regional Recurrence Free Survival	0 - 120 Months	time to new regional lymph node recurrence
Sensitivity / specificity and positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PET/CT for pelvic disease at diagnosis of groin LN involvement by melanoma.	0 - 120 Months	The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and CT for detecting pelvic lymph nodes positive for metastatic melanoma as confirmed by histopathology will be assessed in the sub-group of patients screened and shown to have a positive pelvic LN on PET/CT and those patients who had negative pelvic LN on PET/CT and randomised for I-IL treatment.
Overall Survival	0 - 120 months	time from randomisation to death from any cause
Distant Disease Free Survival	0 - 120 Months	time to new distant melanoma recurrence
Quality Of Life	0 - 120 Months	Quality Of Life questionnaires completed by patients
Morbidity differences	Up to 120 days from lymphadenectomy, and from 0 - 120 months	This includes lymphoedema, wound complications (wound infections, dehiscence/necrosis, and seroma) chronic pain, and restriction in mobility
Resource use and utility based Quality Of Life	0 - 60 Months	Resource use will be identified from the trial case report forms, and valued according the relevant Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups and Medicare Benefits Schedule item numbers.The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will calculate total costs and mean per patient costs per surgical group allocation, as well as total and mean benefits per group allocation.

Trial Locations

Locations (17)

Westmead Hospital; 🇦🇺 Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; 🇦🇺 Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital; 🇬🇧 Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom

Calvary Public Hospital Bruce; 🇦🇺 Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Sydney Adventist Hospital; 🇦🇺 Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Melanoma Institute Australia - The Poche Centre; 🇦🇺 North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Mater Hospital Brisbane; 🇦🇺 Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; 🇦🇺 Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Hospital de Câncer de Barretos; 🇧🇷 Barretos, SP, Brazil

University Medical Center Groningen; 🇳🇱 Groningen, Netherlands

A.C. Camargo Cancer Center; 🇧🇷 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Veneto Institute of Oncology - IOV; 🇮🇹 Padova, Veneto, Italy

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center; 🇳🇱 Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana; 🇸🇮 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals; 🇬🇧 London, United Kingdom

St George's Hospital; 🇬🇧 London, United Kingdom

St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals; 🇬🇧 St Helens, United Kingdom