Effect of a Plant-Focused Diet on Nutritional Status in Malnourished Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)End Stage Kidney Disease (ESRD)Peritoneal Dialysis (PD)Malnourished
- Registration Number
- NCT07157397
- Lead Sponsor
- National University of Malaysia
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a plant-focused diet improves nutritional and health outcomes of malnourished adults undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). It will also learn about the safety of this diet in this population.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Does a plant-focused diet improve nutritional status compared to a standard kidney diet in PD patients?
2. What changes occur in anthropometric, biochemical, and dietary measures over 6 months?
Researchers will compare the plant-focused diet to a standard-of-care renal diet to see which is more effective in improving nutrition in PD patients.
Participants will:
* Be randomly assigned to follow the plant-focused diet or the standard diet.
* Be monitored for 6 months through in-person visits (aligned with their routine clinic appointments) and virtual check-ins via messages or calls.
* Have their progress monitored for changes in outcomes such as nutrition, blood tests, kidney function, and quality of life.
- Detailed Description
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a growing health concern in Malaysia, with a significant increase in the proportion of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) from 13.0% in 2014 to 18% in 2023. While PD offers certain clinical advantages, it is associated with common complications such as malnutrition and protein-energy wasting (PEW), which contribute to poor patient outcomes.
Emerging evidence suggests that plant-focused diets may have beneficial effects on nutritional status, inflammation, and metabolic complications in PD patients. However, data on their safety, efficacy, and long-term impact in this population remain limited. Hence, this study aims to address this research gap.
This study is a randomized, open-label clinical trial that will compare the effects of a plant-focused diet to a standard-of-care renal diet in malnourished PD patients over a 6-month period.
Participants will be recruited from Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz (HCTM) UKM and randomized into two groups. Both groups will receive individualised dietary counselling and will be followed-up according to their assigned diet plan. Monitoring will occur through physical visits aligned with routine clinic visits, and through virtual check-ins (messages or phone calls). Key outcomes will be measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
The objectives of this study is:
1. To assess the baseline nutritional status of PD patients in relation to their dietary knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP), sociodemographic and medical history, anthropometric measurements, biochemical and dietary data, malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS), physical function, quality of life (QOL), and appetite.
2. To compare changes in primary outcomes consisting of dietary adequacy, dialysis adequacy, and kidney function, between groups after 3 and 6 months of intervention.
3. To compare changes in secondary outcomes consisiting of anthropometric measurements, biochemical data, inflammatory markers, adherence to the dietary regime, MIS, physical function, QOL, appetite, and retention rate, between groups after 3 and 6 months.
The findings of this trial may provide important evidence to guide nutritional recommendations for PD patients, improve nutritional outcomes, and address common misconceptions that may contribute to poor dietary intake in this population.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Adult outpatients (>18 years old), attending HTCM PD clinic visits
- Have undergone peritoneal dialysis for at least 6 months
- Have a serum albumin level <40 g/L
- Have a BMI of < 25 kg/m2
- Have a malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) of mild, moderate or severe
- Agreed to follow the dietary instructions based on the randomization assignment
- Agreed to attend baseline visits and additional follow-up appointments at months 1, 3, and 6 post- randomization, either in person or via telehealth, and respond to monthly or more frequent phone calls
- Have been hospitalized for the past 3 months
- Have ongoing infection/sepsis
- Has undergone surgery in the past 6 months
- Have high inflammatory diseases, malignancy, or cancer
- Have dialysis adequacy of <1.2 Kt/V
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in Dietary Adequacy At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention Dietary intake collected from analysis of 3-day dietary recalls (2 weekdays, 1 weekend), using Nutritionist Pro software.
Dietary adequacy is assessed based on the comparison of each participant's macro- and micro-nutrient intakes against their estimated nutrient requirements. A deviation of more than 20% from the requirement will be classified as dietary inadequacy. Data will be summarised as percentage of participants meeting vs. not meeting adequacy.Changes in Dialysis Adequacy At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Dialysis adequacy will be assessed using weekly Kt/V (urea), obtained from patients' medical records. A total Kt/V \< 1.7 will be considered indicative of inadequate dialysis.
Changes in Concentration of Urea At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. A renal function parameter, measured in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Concentration of Creatinine At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. A renal function parameter, measured in µmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Concentration of Sodium At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. A renal function parameter, measured in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Concentration of Potassium At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. A renal function parameter, measured in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Concentration of Phosphate At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. A renal function parameter, measured in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Concentration of Serum Albumin At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. A renal function parameter, measured in g/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Concentration of Total Protein At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. A renal function parameter, measured in g/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in Weight At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Post-dialysis weight will be measured in kilograms (kg), using a digital scale, with patients wearing light clothing and no heavy objects.
Height At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Height will be measured in centimeters (cm), with patients standing straight on the stadiometer, following the Frankfurt horizontal plane.
Changes in Body mass index (BMI) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Body mass index will be calculated by dividing weight (kg) by the square of height (m²), recorded as kg/m².
Changes in Triceps skinfold (TSF) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Triceps skinfold will be assessed using skinfold callipers, recorded in centimetres (cm).
Changes in Dietary Adherence/Compliance Baseline and monthly, for up to 6 months. Patients will be required to complete a 3-day food diary (2 weekdays and 1 weekend). Food diaries will be reviewed monthly, either in person at clinic visits or remotely via phone or messaging, and will be scored using the binary dietary compliance scoring system developed specifically for this study. Using the scoring system (maximum score = 21), a total score of \<10.5 out of 21 (\<50%) will be classified as poor compliance, while a score of ≥10.5 out of 21 (≥50%) will be considered adequate.
The scoring system will be pilot tested with patients during the first 2 weeks of the study period.Changes in Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (MIS) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Each component (medical history, physical examination, BMI, and laboratory markers) is scored from 0 (normal nutrition status) to 3 (severe nutritional deficit), with a total score ranging from 0 (normal) to 30 (severe malnutrition and inflammation). A score of \<5 indicates normal nutritional status, while ≥5 signifies malnutrition.
Changes in Appetite and Food Satisfaction (AFSQ) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Evaluated using the Appetite and Food Satisfaction Questionnaire (AFSQ). Consists a facial hedonic scale to assess appetite levels and five additional questions. Each question is scored from 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 (best appetite and food satisfaction) to 18 (worst appetite and food satisfaction).
Changes in Quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Evaluated using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF). It consists of 26 items categorized into four domains: physical health, psychological well-being, social relationships, and environment. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and domain scores are calculated as the mean of their respective items. Raw domain scores are transformed to a 4-20 scale and further converted to a 0-100 scale to facilitate interpretation, with higher scores indicating better QOL
Changes in Physical Function (SPPB) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), with scores calculated and higher total scores indicating better physical function. Muscular strength will be measured using the Jamar handgrip dynamometer.
Changes in Physical Activity Levels (IPAQ-SF) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Evaluated using the International Physical Activity Short Form questionnaire. Total scores are calculated by summing the duration and frequency of all activities, while domain-specific and activity-specific sub scores are also determined. The collected data will be reported as either a continuous measure or in metabolic equivalents (METs) per minute.
Retention Rate End of study (after 6 months of intervention). The retention rate will be calculated as the percentage of participants who complete the 6-month study period. The number of participants completing the study will be divided by the total number enrolled and multiplied by 100.
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Mid-upper arm circumference will be measured using a measuring tape, recorded in centimetres (cm).
Mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) will be calculated using the formula: MAMC = MUAC - (π × TSF). Measurements will be recorded in centimetres (cm). It serves as an anthropometric indicator of muscle mass and is used as a proxy for lean body mass when bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is unavailable. A lower MAMC reflects reduced muscle reserves and potential malnutrition.
Body composition using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) Device At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Body composition will be assessed using a Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) device, if available. Parameters recorded will include: Lean Tissue Mass (kg), Fat Tissue Mass (kg), Adipose Tissue Mass (kg), Body Cell Mass (kg), Lean Tissue Index (kg/m²), Fat Tissue Index (kg/m²), Total Body Water (L), Intracellular Water (L), Extracellular Water (L), Extracellular/Intracellular (E/I) Ratio, and Overhydration (L).
Changes in Total cholesterol At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Serum total cholesterol, a parameter of the lipid profile, will be recorded in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges
Changes in Triglycerides At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Serum tryglycerides, a parameter of the lipid profile, will be recorded in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges
Changes in High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Serum High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), a parameter of the lipid profile, will be recorded in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges
Changes in Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Serum Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a parameter of the lipid profile, will be recorded in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges
Changes in Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), a parameter of the blood glucose profile, will be recorded in %, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), a parameter of the blood glucose profile, will be recorded in mmol/L, obtained from medical records. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Serum Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Serum Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC), an inflammatory marker, will be obtained from medical records and recorded in µmol/L. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Serum High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Serum hsCRP, an inflammatory marker, will be measured in mg/L. A 10 mL fasting blood sample (following a 12-hour overnight fast) will be collected by trained hospital staff using automated procedures. Samples will be analysed at an external accredited laboratory (Innoquest). Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Changes in Normalised protein catabolic rate (nPCR) At baseline, after 3 months of intervention, and after 6 months of intervention. Normalised protein catabolic rate (nPCR), a protein intake indicator, will be obtained from medical records and recorded in g/kg/day. Results will be compared against standard laboratory reference ranges.
Dietary Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) Questionnaire At baseline. Participants will complete a 34-item questionnaire adapted from a validated tool used in haemodialysis patients. It includes three subscales: knowledge (12 items), attitude (7 items), and practice (15 items). Knowledge items are scored 0-1 (correct/incorrect), while attitude and practice items are rated on a 0-4 Likert scale. Higher total scores reflect better dietary KAP.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM
🇲🇾Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM🇲🇾Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaDr. Wan Rohaslizan Binti Wan DaudContact+60192218051rohaslizan@hctm.ukm.edu.my