The Getting Real About The Talk (GReAT) Project - A Qualitative, Patient-Centered Evaluation of the Factors for Successfully Having 'The Talk' and Implementation for Attending and Trainee Physicians

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Self Efficacy

• Registration Number: NCT04078932
• Lead Sponsor: Jeffrey Eugene, MD

Brief Summary

The killing of young black men by police officers is a major public health issue and is a clear health disparity. Black men are 21 times more likely to be fatally shot by a police officer than white men. Homicide is the second-leading cause of death of black males, ages 15-34. It is disconcerting to consider that this statistic includes homicide by police officer. Pediatricians have an opportunity to contribute to violence prevention efforts and social justice advocacy for young black men in regards to interactions with police officers.

We seek to engage residents in social justice advocacy by preparing them to discuss safely navigating police encounters with young black males. Adverse police encounters can result in poor mental health outcomes, physical trauma, and death. We will develop a conversation script with input from existing expert resources, black male youth, and their caregivers. The script will be patient-centered and will be used to facilitate a conversation about safely navigating encounters with police officers. Utilizing a train-the-trainer model, attending pediatric physicians will be trained to use the script in their practice as well as model and demonstrate how to use the script for pediatric residents. We hypothesize that pediatric residents trained in the conversation script will be empowered to facilitate discussions on safely navigating police encounters in the primary care clinic setting and will exhibit increased comfort and greater levels of self-efficacy from baseline measures.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2019-08-28
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-09-03
• Study First Posted: 2019-09-06
• Status Verified: 2021-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-02-08
• Last Update Posted: 2021-02-10
• Study Start: 2021-12-01
• Primary Completion: 2022-06
• Study Completion: 2023-06

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 50

Inclusion Criteria

• Resident physician trainee at a designated academic medical center-based primary care clinic serving predominately black youth in Philadelphia

Exclusion Criteria

• Non-resident physician trainee
• Resident physician preference to not participate
• Not affiliated with the designated academic medical center-based primary care clinic

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Resident physician Self-Efficacy	Change from Baseline Feelings of Self-Efficacy at 6 months	Likert-type, self-reported Self-efficacy instrument. The items on the survey instrument will assess for feelings of self-efficacy pre-intervention (baseline) and 6 months post-intervention. Respondents will select their level of agreement with each item on the survey, selecting within a range from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". "Strongly agree" indicates the highest level of agreement with each statement on the survey. Respondents who predominately select "strongly agree" for the items on the survey express greater levels of self-efficacy with delivering the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Frequency of delivering the script in clinical practice	Change from Baseline Frequency of Delivering the Script at 6 months	Self-response to the following question: In the past 6 months, how many times have you delivered the conversation script (the intervention) to African-American male youth ages 9-18? Respondents will answer by selecting between the following choices: 0 times, 1-5 times, 5-10 times, 10-15 times, and greater than 15 times.
Resident physician Comfort Level	Change from Baseline Comfort Level at 6 months	Likert-type, self-reported instrument assessing comfort with delivering the intervention. The items on the survey instrument will assess for comfort pre-intervention (baseline) and 6 months post-intervention. Respondents will select their level of agreement with each item on the survey, selecting within a range from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". "Strongly agree" indicates the highest level of agreement with each statement on the survey. Respondents who predominately select "strongly agree" for the items on the survey express greater levels of comfort with delivering the intervention.