Device to Reduce Surgery Site Contamination
- Conditions
- Surgery
- Interventions
- Device: Sham Air Barrier System deviceDevice: Air Barrier System Device
- Registration Number
- NCT00972153
- Lead Sponsor
- Nimbic Systems, LLC
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to determine whether the Air Barrier System device reduces airborne particulate and airborne colony forming units present at a surgery site.
- Detailed Description
The Air Barrier System is a device that uses localized clean air flow to shield a surgery site from ambient airborne contamination. This study examines the hypothesis that the Air Barrier System can reduce the presence of airborne colony-forming units (e.g. bacteria colonies) and particulate at the surgery site.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 29
- Candidate for primary total hip arthroplasty
- Prior history of infection
- Revision arthroplasty
- Screens positive for MRSA
- Undergoing hemiarthroplasty or resurfacing
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Device attached, not activated Sham Air Barrier System device - Device deployed and activated Air Barrier System Device -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Surgery Site CFU Density Ten minute intervals throughout surgery Colony forming unit counts were collected from the air within 5 cm of the surgical wound using a bioaerosol "slit" sampling device. Air was drawn through a sterile PVC tubing located at the incision and impacted upon media (TSA 5% sheep's blood) plates located in the sampling device. The plates were exchanged every 10 minutes throughout the procedure. Values are presented as CFU/cubic meter.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Surgery Site Particulate Density (Size >10 Micrometer)Per Cubic Meter Ten minute intervals throughout surgery Airborne particulate was measured using a particle analyzer (LASAIR II 310B). The analyzer sampled continuously during surgery at a rate of 28.3 L/min and recorded data at one-minute intervals. The samples were collected through a length of sterile PVC tubing with the end placed adjacent to the CFU sample tubing, within 5 cm of the surgical incision. Particles of various diameters were obtained; particles of size \>10 micrometer had the strongest correlation to the presence of CFUs at the incision site.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Texas Orthopedic Hospital
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States