MedPath

Comparing the Effects of Microsecond Pulse Duration Light System and Millisecond Pulse Duration Light System in Treatment of Facial Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Phase 1
Recruiting
Conditions
comparative effectivenesscentrofacial erythemaerythematotelangiectasiamicrosecond pulse duration light systemmillisecond pulse duration light systemrosacea
comparative effectiveness
centrofacial erythema
erythematotelangiectasia
microsecond pulse duration light system
millisecond pulse duration light system
rosacea
Registration Number
TCTR20170418002
Lead Sponsor
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria

with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea on both sides of their faces and Fitzpatrick skin phototypes of III to V, who aged 33 to 58 years, were enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria were acute inflammatory lesions such as papules, pustules, or vesicles, photosensitivity, pregnancy, lactation, and skin phototypes of V and VI. Each participant signed a written informed consent.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath