MedPath

INtracorporeal Versus EXTracorpoREal anastoMOsis After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy for Cancer

Not Applicable
Conditions
Colorectal Cancer
Registration Number
NCT01679756
Lead Sponsor
Ospedale Misericordia e Dolce
Brief Summary

The aim of this systematic review is to compare intracorporeal (IA) versus extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer.

Detailed Description

Background. Only a few retrospective publications comparing these anastomotic techniques and no randomized clinical trial has been performed. We conducted a meta-analysis of the existing non randomized comparative studies on the argument: the results suggest that the IA results in better postoperative recovery outcomes, such as shorter hospital stay, faster bowel movement recovery, faster first flatus, faster time to solid diet and lesser analgesic usage.

Design: Two-armed, double-blinded, randomized, controlled study.

The patients will be randomized into two groups:

A. After laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer, anastomosis will be carried out intracorporeally (IA) B. After laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer, anastomosis will be carried out extracorporeally (EA)

Primary endpoint: Surgical morbidity rate defined as any diagnosed morbidity related to surgical technique (anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, wound infection, ileus) within 60 days from surgery.

Secondary endpoints:

* Intra-operative: operative time, largest incision length (mm), number of nodes harvested, intraoperative complications.

* Early postoperative: mortality, non-surgical site complications.

* Postoperative recovery: bowel movement, first flatus, time to solid diet, nasogastric tube (NGT) reintroduction, day of analgesic usage, length of stay, readmission.

Randomization. The randomization will be obtained through a computer generated program (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA). The randomization, will be done before the beginning of the study and it will consist with an ordered series of numbers with a corresponding letter: A for intracorporeal anastomosis and B for extracorporeal anastomosis. This series of numbers will be kept in a central dedicated web database; after right colon cancer diagnosis, if the patient fulfills the inclusion criteria and signs the consent a number, progressive as in order of inclusion, will be assigned to him or her. The letter corresponding to the number, and hence the type of procedure to perform, will be notified to the operating surgeon, who will proceed accordingly.

Blinding. A second surgeon team (different from the one who participate in the intervention), aware of the operative findings but not the management of the anastomosis, will then assume the care of the patient. Postoperative care and ability to be discharged from the hospital will be determined by the second surgical team. This second surgical team will be blinded to the kind of anastomosis. The primary operative team will be in every moment available for emergent consultation.

Power Calculation. The reported prevalence of surgical morbidity after laparoscopic colectomy varies widely from 5-15%16-39, usually depending on the definition of complications and the type of resection performed. The most recent Cochrane review on the argument indicates a 8.6% of local morbidity (Wound infection, anastomotic insufficiency, postoperative ileus, postoperative bleeding)40. Therefore the number of patients required was based on the hope of improving the rate of surgical morbidity from 8.6% to 4.3%; considering a drop-out rate of 5%, 384 patients (192 in the IA group and 192 in the EA group) are necessary to ensure an 80% power with an alpha of 5%, when using a two-sided log-rank test. The statistical power sample calculation was carried out using PASS 2005 (Power Analysis and Sample Size, within the statistical package "NCSS 2004 and PASS 2005").

Sixty-four patients will be included by each of the six centers of the consortium. Only surgeons with at least 30 right colectomies performed with intracorporeal anastomosis will be allowed to recruit patients as first operator.

Statistics. To evaluate significance of differences between the two groups, chi-squared and Fisher's exact test will be used as appropriated for categorical variables, and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. Significance level will be set at 5%. The statistical analysis will be carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 13; SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Monitoring. as commonly requested for Randomized Controlled Trials on patients, a strict control of outcomes has been planned during the study. Three experts in laparoscopic colorectal surgery will be designed as member of IN EXTREMO Trial Monitoring Committee. They would have access to the data during the whole course of the study and indicate cessation of the trial if one arm is providing manifestly inferior results.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
384
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall surgical morbidity60 days from surgery

Surgical morbidity rate defined as any diagnosed morbidity related to surgical technique (anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, wound infection, ileus) within 60 days from surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Operative timeday of intervention

Minutes from skin incision to skin closure

Largest incision lengthday of intervention

millimeters of skin incision

Numbers of node harvestedday of intervention

Numbers of node harvested

Intraoperative complicatonsday of intervention

Incidence and kind of intraoperative morbidity

Mortality60 days from surgery

Incidence and kind of intraoperative morbidity

Non surgical site complications60 days from surgery

Incidence and kind of medical morbidity (cardiovascular, respiratory, or metabolic events; nonsurgical infections; deep venous thrombosis; and pulmonary embolism)

Bowel movement10 days from surgery

Defined as hours from surgery to peristalsis, assessement every 8 hours

First flatus10 days from surgery

Defined as hours from surgery to first flatus

First stool canalization10 days from surgery

Defined as hours from surgery to first stool canalization

Time to solid diet10 days from surgery

Defined as hours from surgery to solid diet tolerance

Naso gastric tube reintroduction60 days from surgery

Defined as rate of NGT reintroduction

Days of analgesic usage60 days from surgery

Defined as number of days after interventions

Length of hospital stay60 days from surgery

Defined as day from surgery to dismission plus eventual days of recovery after readmission

Readmission60 day from intervention

Rate of readmission after home dimission

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Misericordia e Dolce Hospital

🇮🇹

Prato, Po, Italy

Misericordia e Dolce Hospital
🇮🇹Prato, Po, Italy
Francesco Feroci, MD
Contact
+393398382381
fferoci@yahoo.it
Elisa Lenzi, MD
Principal Investigator
Andrea Vannucchi, MD
Sub Investigator
Alessia Garzi, MD
Sub Investigator
Maddalena Baraghini, MD
Sub Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.