Physical Therapy Versus Steroid Injection for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Interventions: Procedure: Manual Physical Therapy
Procedure: Corticosteroid Injection

Registration Number: NCT01190891

Lead Sponsor: Madigan Army Medical Center

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the short and long-term effectiveness of two common interventions, manual physical therapy versus corticosteroid injection, for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome.

Detailed Description: Dysfunction in the shoulder has been reported to affect up to 33% of the general population and generate up to 5% of all consultations from general practitioners. Shoulder problems have been reported as the second highest musculoskeletal complaint for those seeking care from a physical therapist in a deployed environment. Impingement syndromes occur in nearly anyone who repeatedly or forcefully uses their upper extremity in an elevated position, which is very common in the active duty population, and is often characterized by pain during this motion. Managed improperly, this can lead to disruption in work performance and prolonged disability.

Corticosteroid and analgesic injections are some of the most common procedures for orthopedists, rheumatologists, and general practitioners to use in the management of shoulder pain. Conflicting reports from systematic reviews questions the efficacy of corticosteroid injections over other interventions, including oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Additionally they are not without potential risk such as infection or deleterious effects of prolonged corticosteroid use to include tissue degeneration reported in animal studies as well as other regions of the human body. Manual physical therapy offers a non-invasive approach with negligible risk in as few as three to six sessions and has been shown to improve strength and function in this patient population.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two interventions that are commonly used in the management of shoulder impingement syndrome.

1. Evaluate the effect that a subacromial corticosteroid injection has on a subject's function and pain as measured by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

2. Evaluate the effect that manual physical therapy has on a subject's function and pain as measured by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

3. Compare the effect sizes of the two different interventions in a patient population with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 104

Inclusion Criteria

Age between 18-65
Read, write, and speak English
Tricare beneficiary and eligible for healthcare at a military treatment facility
Primary complaint of shoulder pain
Meets diagnostic criteria for shoulder impingement (mentioned below)

To be included in the study participants are required to have:

pain with one of the 2 tests in category I, and
pain with one test from either category II or category III. * "pain" is defined as reproduction of the usual pain that the subject experiences that makes up the nature of their complaint.

Category I: Impingement signs

Passive overpressure at full shoulder flexion with the scapula stabilized.
Passive internal rotation at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion in the scapular plane and in progressive degrees of horizontal adduction.

Category II: Active shoulder abduction Active shoulder abduction Category Ill: resisted break tests

Abduction
Internal rotation
External rotation

Exclusion Criteria

History of shoulder injection in last 3 months
History of shoulder dislocation, subluxation, fracture, adhesive capsulitis of the glenohumeral joint, or cervical/shoulder/upper back surgery
Full-thickness rotator cuff tears
Presence of cervical radiculopathy, radiculitis, or referral from cervical spine
Total baseline SPADI score not less than 20% (to prevent a ceiling effect with treatment)
Prior OMPT treatment to the involved limb for the current episode of pain
Military service members pending a medical evaluation board, a physical valuation board, or equivalent discharge process, or in medical hold to determine long term disposition. For non-military personnel, anyone that is pending or undergoing any litigation for their injury.
Contraindication to receiving a corticosteroid injection (allergies, adverse reactions, history of multiple injections in that area even if not within last 30 days, etc)
Inability to fill out informed consent form
Unable to come into the clinic for regular treatment over the course of the following month.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Manual Physical Therapy	Manual Physical Therapy	The orthopaedic manual physical therapy (OMPT) intervention approach used in this study will be based on an impairment model. The physical therapist providing the intervention will address the impairments found in the shoulder joints to include the acromioclavicular joint, glenohumeral joint, and scapular-thoracic joints, and cervical/thoracic spine. Patients will receive procedures tailored to their specific impairments. Procedures will include mobilizations and manipulations of the joint and soft-tissues.
Corticosteroid Injection (Subacromial)	Corticosteroid Injection	Location: Subacromial space; Syringe: 10mL; Needle: 25 gauge, 1.5 inch; Anesthetic: 6 mL of 1% lidocaine or marcaine; Corticosteroid: 1.0 mL Triamcinolone Acetonide (Kenalog), 40 mg/mL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index	1 year	The SPADI is a 100-point, 13 item self-administered questionnaire divided into two subscales (pain and disability), with higher scores indicating greater pain and disability. It is responsive to change and accurately discriminates between patients who are improving or worsening. It has high test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The minimal detectable change (MDC) is 18 and the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) is between 8-13 points. The validity and responsiveness to change of SPADI have been described in physical therapy, as well as primary and secondary care settings.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Global Rating of Change	1 year	The GROC questionnaire is an instrument that measures overall changes in the quality of life of the subject. The use of a GROC is a common, feasible, and useful method for assessing outcome, and has been shown to be a valid measurement of change in patient status in other pain populations. A change in score of three rating points has been established as a clinically significant in the patients perception of quality of life. The GROC has 15 possible choices, with 0 being equal to no change and -1 to -7 indicating a negative change and +1 to +7 indicating a positive change.