MedPath

Narrow-band (NB)-UVB vs. Bath-PUVA and NB-UVB Plus Salt Water Baths in Atopic Dermatitis

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Atopic Dermatitis
Interventions
Radiation: NB-UVB
Radiation: Bath-PUVA
Radiation: NB-UVB plus salt water baths
Registration Number
NCT01402414
Lead Sponsor
Ruhr University of Bochum
Brief Summary

In this controlled crossover study we aim to compare the efficacy of narrow-band UVB (NB-UVB) with bath-PUVA and NB-UVB plus salt water baths in atopic dermatitis.

Detailed Description

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a very common skin disorder that is characterized by pruritic inflammatory skin lesions, with patients usually having an individual or family history of atopic diseases in their background (e.g., allergic asthma and rhinitis). Defective skin barrier, immunological dysfunctions (type I and IV allergy), genetic disorders, and psychological factors contribute to the pathogenesis of AD. However, among these factors, CD4+ Th cells are reported to play a particularly crucial role in the pathogenesis of AD. Phototherapy is among the first-line approaches in the management of AD. In this context, a variety of studies have shown a beneficial effect of natural or artificial UV radiation in AD. Different broadband (BB) UV spectra (BB-UVA, BB-UVB, BB-UVA/BB-UVB) and combined treatment modalities such as balneophototherapy and PUVA have previously been proven to be effective in AD. A small controlled study has previously demonstrated that the combination of UVB/UVA and saltwater baths is superior to phototherapy alone. Previous data from uncontrolled studies also speak for the effectiveness of systemic psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) therapy. A controlled crossover study has shown that systemic PUVA therapy is clearly superior to UVA1 phototherapy both in terms of clinical score (SCORAD) and reduction of response time. Systemic PUVA has in relation to bath PUVA significantly greater adverse effects (eg, nausea, liver enzyme elevation, photocarcinogenesis). A direct comparison between NB-UVB and bath PUVA has only been studied by a half-side comparison in a small number of patients. Both therapies were proved equally effective. In a recent study, it has been shown a clear advantage of NB-UVB plus salt water baths in comparison to NB-UVB alone. Tolerability was comparable; both treatments showed to be safe.

A randomized observer-blinded controlled crossover trial is conducted in which patients with AD receive a 4-week course of both NB-UVB and bath-PUVA or NB-UVB plus salt water baths. Clinical efficacy is assessed using the Six Area, Six Sign, Atopic Dermatitis (SASSAD) score and a visual analogue scale for pruritus. Assessment of health-related quality of life was performed using the Skindex-29. Moreover, immunohistochemical, RT-PCR and serological studies are planned.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with moderate to severe disease AD with SASSAD-Score > 25
  • Age > 18 years
  • No topical steroids or topical/systemic antibiotics within the last 2 weeks, no systemic glucocorticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents within the last 8 weeks, no phototherapy within the last 12 weeks before inclusion
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Skin cancer or dysplastic naevi, photosensitive skin diseases, autoimmune diseases or relevant cardiovascular diseases
  • Photo-skin type I according to Fitzpatrick
  • severe cardiovascular disease
  • intense UV radiation (tanning beds, sun exposure, phototherapy, etc.) 8 weeks before the start of the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NB-UVBNB-UVBNB-UVB irradiations adapted to the NB-MED-UVB (70%) started and increased by 10-20% per session.
Bath-PUVABath-PUVAPhototherapy with UVA irradiation following bathing in psoralen water
NB-UVB plus salt water bathsNB-UVB plus salt water bathsBalneophototherapy with NB-UVB and 3% Dead Sea salt water baths
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical improvement after treatments using a validated SASSAD indexEvaluation at baseline and after 4-week treatment, 3 months follow-up

Clinical improvement after treatments using a validated SASSAD index

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluation of pruritus and sleeplessness visual analogue scalesEvaluation at baseline and after 4-week treatment, 3 months follow-up

Evaluation of pruritus and sleeplessness using visual analogue scales with 0 being no complaints and 10 being the worst complaints imaginable

Measuring quality of life using the Skindex-29Evaluation at baseline and after 4-week treatment, 3 months follow-up

Measuring patient's satisfaction / safety and quality of life using a qualified questionnaire: the Skindex-29.

Immunohistochemical, RT-PCR and serological parametersEvaluation at baseline and after 4-week treatment

Measuring several immunohistochemical, RT-PCR and serological parameters in skin and blood, respectively.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Dermatology, Ruhr University Bochum

🇩🇪

Bochum, NRW, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath