Accuracy Assessment of Intraoral Scan Versus Conventional Impression in Edentulous Patients With Flabby Ridges: A Prospective Clinical Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 12
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- accuracy evaluation
研究概览
简要总结
In vivo prospective clinical study will be designed, 12 participants will be included. After intraoral scanning, a conventional impression is made for each patient. The groups will be compared for accuracy.
详细描述
- Recruit 12 eligible edentulous patients
- Scanning Process: Perform five intraoral scans (IOS) of the maxillary flabby ridges for each patient.
. WTI: perform five WTI for each patient
-
STL Export: Export scans and corresponding cast scans obtained via the Window Technique Impression (WTI) as STL files using the intraoral scanner software.
-
3D Distance Measurement: Import IOS and cast STL files into Geomagic Wrap 2017 for a two-phase best-fit alignment, using the Cast scan as the reference for evaluating trueness and precision.
-
Comparison of Scans:
-
Compare the IOS scan and corresponding cast scan obtained via the Window Technique Impression (WTI) to calculate trueness -compare WTI and corresponding cast scan obtained via the Window Technique Impression (WTI) to calculate trueness-
-
Compare each of the five IOS impressions by using each scan as a reference against the others to calculate precision.
-
Compare each of the five WTI impressions by using each scan as a reference against the others to calculate precision. • Deviation Analysis: Generate a color difference map of each superimposition for visual analysis of deviation patterns.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Sequential
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 50 Years 至 75 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Inclusion criteria for participant selection will be as follows:
- •completely edentulous patients with maxillary flabby ridge;
- •Absence of infectious diseases;
- •Systemic good health (ASA-1/ASA-2). .;
- •Age between 50 and 75 years;
- •Willingness to cooperate throughout the data collection process.
排除标准
- •Exclusion criteria included:
- •Presence of any remaining teeth;
- •Inability to comprehend the study's objectives and procedures;
- •ridge defect or lesion;
- •Postoperative scarring on the ridge;
- •Limitations in mouth opening.
结局指标
主要结局
accuracy evaluation
时间窗: 1 month
Accuracy Evaluation: The accuracy of the digital impressions versus conventional impression based on trueness and precision will be evaluated. - Trueness: Trueness is the degree of agreement between the digital impression and the reference scan. To assess trueness, we will measure the deviation between the reference and scanned files. Precision: Precision is a statistical measure that quantifies the level of similarity between repeated samples within the same group. In the context of this study, the IOS impression STL files will be compared to each other in a manner similar to the previous comparisons
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Dina ElAwady
Associate Prof Of Prosthodontics
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts